Show me your 167.005 or 168.005 connie

septentrio · Dec 22, 2020

Following the ‘show me your 2852 connie’ topic, I really think this legendary reference deserves its own topic, instead of the shared ‘vintage Constellation’ thread.

Show me your 167 or 168.005 here! Let’s discuss these marvelous pieces in depth.

krogerfoot · Dec 22, 2020

I haven't managed to catch a good photo of mine. I wasn't entirely sure of the appeal of what they call 12-facet Constellations here, but after having one on the wrist I really get it. Delicate and precise.

joe band · Dec 22, 2020

septentrio
Following the ‘show me your 2852 connie’ topic, I really think this legendary reference deserves its own topic, instead of the shared ‘vintage Constellation’ thread.

Show me your 167 or 168.005 here! Let’s discuss these marvelous pieces in depth.

DIBS!

MSNWatch · Dec 22, 2020

18k YG:

STANDY · Dec 22, 2020

MSNWatch
18k YG:

Only one.........😗

bubu16 · Dec 22, 2020

Here is mine.

seekingseaquest · Dec 22, 2020

No 1490* references?

bubu16 · Dec 22, 2020

Sorry -center piece
and the back view

gbesq · Dec 22, 2020

I’ll offer my two pie pan Constellations. First, my 1964 reference 167.005 in stainless steel with rose gold hands, indices and onyx inlays on an Omega number 12 stainless steel seven row beads of rice bracelet. Second, my 1962 reference 14900 (the predecessor of the 167.005) in gold cap with a crosshair dial on a black alligator strap.