Should I have passed on this 1944 Omega 2272-1?

Posts
12
Likes
7
Hello again,

I purchased an Omega Seamaster today. I was also planning to buy this 1944 Omega JUMBO 39mm Ref 2272-1 Cal. 30Т2, Solid Gold Bezel. However I let it pass. The price would’ve been about $1000.

Below are the attached pictures. Should I have purchased it? Was this a steal? The quality looks really good however I don’t know if it was a good purchase. Please let me know and thank you for the help again ❤️
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
You dodged a bullet.

thank you for replying again XJR. Can you educate me why it was smart to pass? I just want to be as educated as possible on these vintage watches 😀
 
Posts
21,873
Likes
49,616
You dodged a bullet.

Took the words right out of my mouth. Terrible re-dial, badly polished, bezel probably not original, regulator position suggests the movement is in bad need of servicing, and other issues. Way over-priced for what it is, and really not worth buying at all IMO.
Edited:
 
Posts
12,100
Likes
21,004
Bad redial and a good pass.

It would be worth spending time reading various threads on this forum to build your knowledge prior to buying.
 
Posts
12
Likes
7
Bad redial and a good pass.

It would be worth spending time reading various threads on this forum to build your knowledge prior to buying.
Bad redial and a good pass.

It would be worth spending time reading various threads on this forum to build your knowledge prior to buying.

thank you for the advice and help 😀 I will do for the future
 
Posts
138
Likes
103
Bad redial and a good pass.

It would be worth spending time reading various threads on this forum to build your knowledge prior to buying.
Hello, could you please share why it is a redial? I'd love to learn so I can spot such things more easily in the future. Thanks!
 
Posts
12,100
Likes
21,004
Hello, could you please share why it is a redial? I'd love to learn so I can spot such things more easily in the future. Thanks!

Hashes and font is too thick, quality is poor, minute hashes are unevenly spaced.
 
Posts
138
Likes
103
Hashes and font is too thick, quality is poor, minute hashes are unevenly spaced.

Ah, yes, I see what you're saying. Thanks for sharing!
 
Posts
3,424
Likes
7,351
For completion I want to add: Ref 2272 does not have a diameter of 39mm (maybe including crown...) - its diameter is 37.5 mm