Should a brand new Omega be running 1 or more seconds slow per day after a few weeks?

Posts
387
Likes
274
My dad's new Seamaster diver is losing between 0.8 and 2 seconds per day according to a WatchTracker. Should this be something I should chase Omega to rectify considering the METAS agreement should guarantee the movement only gaining time rather than losing it?
 
Posts
16,862
Likes
47,901
Is he doing all 5 positions in the course of a day ::stirthepot::
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
Same.
Mine is currently at -1.5/day measured by my tracking app.
But that link to Archer is a great and valued explanation.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,706
It never ceases to amaze me that people comment on their watch gaining or losing a couple of the 86,400 seconds there are in any given day, are people really expecting a mechanical time piece to be perfectly in sync with the atomic clock?

Or am I just being grouchy because I haven't had a coffee yet?
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
It never ceases to amaze me that people comment on their watch gaining or losing a couple of the 86,400 seconds there are in any given day, are people really expecting a mechanical time piece to be perfectly in sync with the atomic clock?

Or am I just being grouchy because I haven't had a coffee yet?
I have a Seiko that I monitor on the same app, probably worth about £100? It has less deviation than my £4000 Omega?
Just an observation.
 
Posts
301
Likes
389
That kind of +- can be really important.

Is your dad piloting the powered-down Lunar Module, actually towing the CSM back to the earth’s atmosphere?

Was he trying to maneuver to manually adjust the course of the craft?

Did Mission Control determine that he needs to perform a 14-second burn of fuel?

Did he pilot it back to earth?

Hope your dad's home safe.
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
That kind of +- can be really important.

Is your dad piloting the powered-down Lunar Module, actually towing the CSM back to the earth’s atmosphere?

Was he trying to maneuver to manually adjust the course of the craft?

Did Mission Control determine that he needs to perform a 14-second burn of fuel?

Did he pilot it back to earth?

Hope your dad's home safe.
Why be so obnoxious?
This is a legitimate question to be asking on this forum.
The guy is simply asking for some advice?
Also he's talking about a Seamaster???
Edited:
 
Posts
387
Likes
274
New to automatics and new to luxury watches. New to Omega. Sorry I asked guys.
 
Posts
387
Likes
274
Same.
Mine is currently at -1.5/day measured by my tracking app.
But that link to Archer is a great and valued explanation.

Thanks for sharing - I am definitely a bit more at ease with it now. My Aqua Terra runs pretty much the same too.

Completely normal 😁 Just wear and enjoy.

Thank you! Definitely doing that now.
 
Posts
389
Likes
569
New to automatics and new to luxury watches. New to Omega. Sorry I asked guys.
Don't be sorry.
A forum should be a friendly place where you feel comfortable asking questions.
 
Posts
420
Likes
490
It never ceases to amaze me that people comment on their watch gaining or losing a couple of the 86,400 seconds there are in any given day, are people really expecting a mechanical time piece to be perfectly in sync with the atomic clock?

Or am I just being grouchy because I haven't had a coffee yet?
It shouldn't be too hard to relate to someone who is new to the hobby is worried that his $4000 watch is not running according to the specs on paper.
 
Posts
387
Likes
274
Don't be sorry.
A forum should be a friendly place where you feel comfortable asking questions.

Thanks PRW. I guess I'll be more careful not to upset veterans in the watch game with my newbie queries.

It shouldn't be too hard to relate to someone who is new to the hobby is worried that his $4000 watch is not running according to the specs on paper.

I thought everyone was new to the watch hobby once! It was a genuine and innocent question so thank you for understanding. I asked on here because of my ignorance pretty much 😀
 
Posts
29,659
Likes
76,805
I have a Seiko that I monitor on the same app, probably worth about £100? It has less deviation than my £4000 Omega?
Just an observation.

Take 100 of those Seiko watches, and 100 of those Omegas, and I'm pretty sure you would find that over a larger sample, the Omegas will perform better.
 
Posts
29,659
Likes
76,805
It shouldn't be too hard to relate to someone who is new to the hobby is worried that his $4000 watch is not running according to the specs on paper.

Except it is very likely running within specs...it's just that people don't understand the specs.

I do wish the companies who make and market these watches would more fully explain what these tolerances mean, because I answer this question at least once a week somewhere. That's why I made a thread here that can easily be referenced so I didn't have to keep writing it all over again. So I don't blame the people asking, I'm blame the brands for not fully explaining things....