Awetaylor
·I've been looking to get a 70's watch serviced that has been sitting in a cardboard box in a garage for 20 years, so I contacted a local watchmaker for a quote.
He said that if the watch was running reasonably well (it's losing a couple of minutes a day), then it's best not to take it apart at the risk of damaging it in the process.
He specifically said that hands are kept on with friction, and taking them off and on widens the space where the hands are attached to the axle. This is the reason Rolex replace the hands with each service.
Does this sound right to you guys? I remember @Archer on a different thread explaining that hands were replaced at Omega because they can have a less skilled worker take out the movement with minimal risk
This exchange threw me, as I understood regular servicing to be crucial for a vintage watch.
He said that if the watch was running reasonably well (it's losing a couple of minutes a day), then it's best not to take it apart at the risk of damaging it in the process.
He specifically said that hands are kept on with friction, and taking them off and on widens the space where the hands are attached to the axle. This is the reason Rolex replace the hands with each service.
Does this sound right to you guys? I remember @Archer on a different thread explaining that hands were replaced at Omega because they can have a less skilled worker take out the movement with minimal risk
This exchange threw me, as I understood regular servicing to be crucial for a vintage watch.


