savio.79
·A "Seamaster" with a 50m depth rating... ðŸ«
That said, I'm glad Omega still invests in HEQ. I've owned a Gen 2 X-33 and still have an X-33 Skywalker and the utility of these watches is pretty much unequalled.
A "Seamaster" with a 50m depth rating... ðŸ«
That said, I'm glad Omega still invests in HEQ. I've owned a Gen 2 X-33 and still have an X-33 Skywalker and the utility of these watches is pretty much unequalled.
A "Seamaster" with a 50m depth rating... ðŸ«
Does this really need more? After all, this was designed for people trying to stay above the water. 50m (164ft) is more than enough should the user take a trip into the water.
Yes, I need to not worry about WR. So 50 m is not enough. Screw down crown and pushers for me please.
Do you swim to depths of 165ft often?
Hmm, still the worst Seamaster ever made, what's next? new Speedmaster moonwatch with Quartz movement? that will cost 10'000 bucks because of bling pawed diamonds on it? what about Spirate regulation technology? have they given up? My statement: HAWK THUAH