Forums Latest Members

Seamaster bumper in for a service, re varnish dial, opinions ?

  1. Gstp Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,928
    And I asked Watchguy uk for a re-varnish of the dial which was unevenly patinated.

    They post the service prosess and take pictures along the way, this is how it came in

    upload_2017-6-28_18-2-3.png



    And this is how it looks now:

    upload_2017-6-28_18-1-18.png

    Bit of a shock actually. Was used to the old look and now I m a bit in doubt whether it was wise or not to add varnish removal to the work sheet. Whats your thoughts on this gents ?
     
    Edited Jun 28, 2017
    Bumper likes this.
  2. padders Oooo subtitles! Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Interesting. I have a couple of 1949/50 hummers in similar, maybe slightly better condition and have pondered this course of action. IMO it does look better after, but he has washed off the remaining radium lume. Inevitable really I suppose as it will be very unstable and virtually falling out but I would rather keep mine with lume so will likely leave them be.
     
  3. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    12,625
    Likes
    29,945
    Well they're only original once and this one isn't anymore...
     
  4. padders Oooo subtitles! Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Well to be fair it is, it is just minus the degraded varnish. I don't see this as invasive as a redial/repaint but I do see the POV.
     
    Mods and BenBagbag like this.
  5. Gstp Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,928
    The patina wasn't original either. It's no longer untouched, but maybe closer to what it once were?
     
  6. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    12,625
    Likes
    29,945
    Now it just looks like a dial which has been cleaned, its lost most of its original lume and character in the process.

    It was no beauty before and still isn't.
     
    BenBagbag likes this.
  7. jumpingsecond Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    829
    Likes
    2,145
    Is this process not considered a redial?
    If not- is there a term for it in regards to it's collectabilty or what one would disclose to a potential buyer?

    Im still trying to figure out all the differences between redial, refresh, etc.
     
    Kathmandu! likes this.
  8. Edward53 Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    If you'd bought it the way it is now and never knew any different, you'd have been perfectly happy. Personally I think they did an extremely good job.
    It's not a redial. Redialling means painting / printing / whatever a new set of markings onto a dial which has had the old ones removed. All that's been done here is removal of the original varnish, which had become discoloured. Whether people like the result or not is a matter of personal taste which, as you can see from the messages above, varies.
     
  9. jumpingsecond Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    829
    Likes
    2,145
    Ok thanks for the info. What is a refresh & refinish? I've seen these terms used in re. To dial conditions as well.
     
  10. Edward53 Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    A refresh and a refinish mean the same thing as a redial or sometimes an overpolished case. They are just weasel words used by sellers trying to make a rather doggy watch sound better than it really is.
     
    Kathmandu! likes this.
  11. Gstp Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,928
    I agree the job is very well executed and I did expect different opinions on the look; whether it was better with or without patina, but that someone actually would say this wasn't original anymore hadn't even crossed my mind.
     
  12. Mouse_at_Large still immune to Speedmaster attraction Jun 28, 2017

    Posts
    2,018
    Likes
    5,269
    To my way of thinking, and I'd stress this is purely my aesthetic, the original dial is fugly, and the redone dial (or refurbished/redialled/refreshed - whatever you want to call it) is an improvement, but still does not make it attractive.

    As it stands it's neither fish nor fowl. I would have bitten the bullet and had it completely restored. I know that would be anathema to the collector purists, but I'm entitled to my opinion ;)

    Sure, it would no longer be original, and that might put it beyond the pale to some, but as it stands, it's kind of in limbo.
     
  13. François Pépin Jun 29, 2017

    Posts
    1,531
    Likes
    1,081
    Cleaning a dial is always risky. In this case the job was correctly done - maybe with the cleaning solution was a little bit strong, but you did not lose markers or letters of the script.
    I agree the dial looks "cleaned" and does not look very good, but you could not expect much better.
     
    Edited Jun 29, 2017
  14. Stu-Silver Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    203
    Likes
    324
    It's quite a change between the 2 and I'm not sure which I prefer. Can you provide before and after pictures of the watch so we can see what impact it has overall?
     
    Syrte likes this.
  15. Gstp Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,928
    Here you are @Stu-Silver
    Mobile phone picture upon return

    20170714_164756-01.jpeg

    How it was:

    chronometre.jpg
     
    Larry S, Syrte, sdre and 3 others like this.
  16. ac106 Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    999
    Likes
    1,616
    NICE. i think you made the right decision. For me the "after" is fantastic!
     
    themartist and Larry S like this.
  17. GordonL Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    429
    Likes
    608
    I think it looks much better now! Maybe not in "original untouched" condition, but much better imho....
     
    Syrte likes this.
  18. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    Sorry, Forum Bylaws, " ..., regardless, in all cases, the opinions of mice or any other Murid shall considered neither be admissible or relevant" :whistling:
     
  19. Mouse_at_Large still immune to Speedmaster attraction Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    2,018
    Likes
    5,269
    J'accuse - a more blatant example of "human speciesism" (human supremacism), as in the exclusion of all nonhuman animals from the rights, freedoms, and protections afforded to humans you would be hard pressed to find.

    You'll be hearing from my lawyers. Might just be a few high-pitched squeaks, but that's the way they roll......

    lawyer rat copy.jpg
    :p
     
    Edited Jul 14, 2017
    Larry S likes this.
  20. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    What's that in his pants, or is just glad to see you...........