Seamaster 300 screw down crown correct?

Posts
465
Likes
786
Hi guys,

I have bought a Seamaster 300, which seems to have all the original parts still. Just one thing I'm wondering, serial number is 22.9mil, but is has a screw down crown, is there any way this could be correct? Or should it always be a Naiad?

And if it should be a naiad, is it do-able to find one?

(Pictures will be shown when the watch comes in)

Best
Robert
 
Posts
628
Likes
1,166
To my understanding, the seamaster 300, 165.024 (no date)/166.024 (with date) , left the Omega factory with the Naiad crown.


Current production Naiaid crown's are easily obtained from eBay.



Here is a reputable seller with one for sale.


https://www.ebay.com/itm/142246253437




♚ @TheSingaporeanWatchBaron ♚ (Instagram)
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
1,072
Likes
1,480
I beleive the earlier ones should be naiaid and the later ones (late 1967, early 1968) should be screw down.
 
Posts
1,799
Likes
2,556
To my understanding, the seamaster 300, 165.024 (no date)/166.024 (with date) , left the Omega factory with the Naiad crown.


Current production Naiaid crown's are easily obtained from eBay.



Here is a reputable seller with one for sale.


https://www.ebay.com/itm/142246253437




♚ @TheSingaporeanWatchBaron ♚ (Instagram)

Not correct, later (1970'ish) would have had screw down fitted and also fitted after service as an improved part (Niaiad leaked at low depth)
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
1,799
Likes
2,556
Not correct, later (1970'ish) would have had screw down fitted and also fitted after service as an improved part (Niaiad leaked at low depth)
Additionally, I would not change one back to Niaiad.