Seamaster 300 bezels

Posts

2,680

Likes

9,844

CajunTiger

·Feb 28, 2016

The 2 blanks are from his first post. He corrected it above. There are only 2 images

 

Posts

3,554

Likes

7,591

mac_omega

·Feb 29, 2016

bookmarked - merken

 

Posts

276

Likes

150

hugo

·Feb 29, 2016

fantastic, excellent Thank you👍

 

Posts

1,320

Likes

640

demollo

·Feb 29, 2016

Thank you !

 

Posts

278

Likes

429

Cal_321

·Feb 29, 2016

Great job, thanks for your work!

 

Posts

282

Likes

93

milhouse

·Feb 29, 2016

Thank you and welcome!

 

Posts

1,818

Likes

2,579

watchlovr

·Feb 29, 2016

Great, so my 27 mil RN 165.024 has the correct (Type F) bezel.
Caseback is a 1970 issue also so it all sounds good.
edit, added a photo

Edited: Jun 5, 2016

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

Oh shit, I have the first one.

 

Posts

4,440

Likes

18,258

Northernman

·Apr 30, 2016·Lemaniac

Fantastic work! 👍
Very helpful information for this community of dedicated collectors.
Checked my 165.024. Extract confirms production at 23rd of February 1968. Serial 26.290.xxx.
Type D fits very well with your lists.

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

mine

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

Northernman

Fantastic work! 👍
Very helpful information for this community of dedicated collectors.
Checked my 165.024. Extract confirms production at 23rd of February 1968. Serial 26.290.xxx.
Type D fits very well with your lists.

Hey nice. Why don't you put a flat crown on?

 

Posts

4,440

Likes

18,258

Northernman

·Apr 30, 2016·Lemaniac

Kwijibo

Hey nice. Why don't you put a flat crown on?

It's the way it was found.
I prefer to keep a bit of history with it.

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

Historically it has a flat crown, hence what I said 😀

 

Posts

4,440

Likes

18,258

Northernman

·Apr 30, 2016·Lemaniac

Kwijibo

Hey nice. Why don't you put a flat crown on?

As for flat crown, du you refer to the Najad type ?
My watch has the later screw down type.
Do you think it's incorrect in anyway?
I would be a tad surprised as the watch appeared when uncovered to be a untouched "barn find".

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

what year is it? around 1967 I guess?

 

Posts

4,440

Likes

18,258

Northernman

·Apr 30, 2016·Lemaniac

Difference:

 

Posts

4,440

Likes

18,258

Northernman

·Apr 30, 2016·Lemaniac

Kwijibo

what year is it? around 1967 I guess?

Extract confirmed 23.02.1968.

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

I can't remember in what year the crown changed...

 

Posts

4,440

Likes

18,258

Northernman

·Apr 30, 2016·Lemaniac

Kwijibo

I can't remember in what year the crown changed...

According to the Worn & Wound purchase guide it was in 1967.

 

Posts

1,889

Likes

2,285

Kwijibo

·Apr 30, 2016

Northernman

Difference:

This pic is funny beacause, see the Omega logos. Tehy seem to be inverted. The thinner one should be the elder the bold one the latter.