Romualdo
·Just joined the group yesterday & said my welcomes
I've attached a few images of a black face Seamaster 30 I was given as a gift over 4 years ago
After some recent online research I've realised that this is highly likely to be a redial/franken job - plus many black face seamasters we see today are redials
I've been too polite to ask where they obtained it from.
Details: had it serviced (internal codes obtained but not photographed) & actually had the crown replaced with an omega one - was difficult to find an original one (one originally on the watch when I received it was not original AFAIK - no omega logo - do all omega watch crowns have the omega symbol on them??)
Cal. 268
Serial movement 18,682,338
Caseback 125.007-63
Case 34.5mm, lugs 18mm
Is the caseback number a mismatch with the movement - I know that the seamaster 30 range did use cal. 268 but the serial movement # fits with 1961. Does the -63 on the caseback mean it was assembled in 1963?
Looking at the pics there are quite a few suspicious anomalies & signs of crappy (re)work
The paint-job on the second hand
The hour markers (lume plots - is that what you call them?) at 5 & 7 are different from the others
The 1 & 2 of the 12 look different.
Does the omega symbol look a bit dodgy
Were Dauphine hands used on these Seamasters?
This was probably a white face that has been given a makeover.
I sure many of you will find more redial issues.
I know the purists will cringe but I quite like it (& it was a gift) - have had quite a few compliments from strangers (of course not in the know) when I have worn it. BTW It's running very well since it's service.
Next time I'll pick an original one myself - probably on this forum (safest bet IMHO)
I have a fondness for black faced omegas especially with the sub-second dial.
I've attached a few images of a black face Seamaster 30 I was given as a gift over 4 years ago
After some recent online research I've realised that this is highly likely to be a redial/franken job - plus many black face seamasters we see today are redials
I've been too polite to ask where they obtained it from.
Details: had it serviced (internal codes obtained but not photographed) & actually had the crown replaced with an omega one - was difficult to find an original one (one originally on the watch when I received it was not original AFAIK - no omega logo - do all omega watch crowns have the omega symbol on them??)
Cal. 268
Serial movement 18,682,338
Caseback 125.007-63
Case 34.5mm, lugs 18mm
Is the caseback number a mismatch with the movement - I know that the seamaster 30 range did use cal. 268 but the serial movement # fits with 1961. Does the -63 on the caseback mean it was assembled in 1963?
Looking at the pics there are quite a few suspicious anomalies & signs of crappy (re)work
The paint-job on the second hand
The hour markers (lume plots - is that what you call them?) at 5 & 7 are different from the others
The 1 & 2 of the 12 look different.
Does the omega symbol look a bit dodgy
Were Dauphine hands used on these Seamasters?
This was probably a white face that has been given a makeover.
I sure many of you will find more redial issues.
I know the purists will cringe but I quite like it (& it was a gift) - have had quite a few compliments from strangers (of course not in the know) when I have worn it. BTW It's running very well since it's service.
Next time I'll pick an original one myself - probably on this forum (safest bet IMHO)
I have a fondness for black faced omegas especially with the sub-second dial.