Melhadary
·Sharing with you a piece which I was very intrigued with and finally verified after quite a bit of research! Would love your comments!
Omega Seamaster 167.070, cal. 551, with original BOR bracelet 1037 end links 570
Was quite intrigued by the presence of the cal. 551 chronometer movement (mainly a Connie movement) in this Geneve style case
And after a bit of reading into the topic, I came by an article in Klassic Uhren magazine, discovered that Omega did place these movements in Geneve SS cases, but did then factory replace the dials to Seamaster dials, I believe since Geneve chronometers were only meant to be in gold cases.
So when I referred back to the archives, it was confirmed that this movement did belong to this case:
And with John Diethelm's confirmation in the magazine article, the dial was most probably factory replaced, giving us this beauty.
Please do share thoughts, negations or confirmations 😀
Omega Seamaster 167.070, cal. 551, with original BOR bracelet 1037 end links 570
Was quite intrigued by the presence of the cal. 551 chronometer movement (mainly a Connie movement) in this Geneve style case
And after a bit of reading into the topic, I came by an article in Klassic Uhren magazine, discovered that Omega did place these movements in Geneve SS cases, but did then factory replace the dials to Seamaster dials, I believe since Geneve chronometers were only meant to be in gold cases.
So when I referred back to the archives, it was confirmed that this movement did belong to this case:
And with John Diethelm's confirmation in the magazine article, the dial was most probably factory replaced, giving us this beauty.
Please do share thoughts, negations or confirmations 😀