Forums Latest Members
  1. Benbradstock Aug 21, 2019

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    440
    F3697537-8960-4F12-AE99-942A39E8942A.jpeg 4BAB65A4-48CE-4924-8A45-CBA13B9CD93E.jpeg Hey all, I’m considering this late 60s Seamaster 166.009. The case seems somewhat overpolished, but my biggest concern is the dial. If it’s a redial, it seems well done, although that would certainly be a dealbreaker for me. Thoughts?
     
    F2280126-F791-4D26-8805-4AC8014C58D0.jpeg
  2. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 21, 2019

    Posts
    15,476
    Likes
    32,332
    At first look my subconscious prompt was redial.

    The word OMEGA is too centred on the E, should normally be a bit more to the right. That, and the cross hairs confirm my opinion that it's a redial.
     
    sdre and Benbradstock like this.
  3. Benbradstock Aug 21, 2019

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    440
    Interesting, I didn’t notice the alignment of the E, and I think you got a point. My only real suspicion was that the dial looks to be in much better condition than the case.
     
  4. TNTwatch Aug 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Looks certainly like a well done redial. With the movement in a rusty condition like that, there's no way the dial can stay that nice. In addition to Jim's notes above, looking more closely at the crosshair, the vertical line seems thinner that the horizontal one.
     
    crayons and Benbradstock like this.
  5. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Aug 21, 2019

    Posts
    15,476
    Likes
    32,332
    A better well lit/well focussed pic would make it easier to tell.

    I'm still with redial and have ignored the rest of the watch.

    Screen Shot 2019-08-22 at 2.30.34 PM.png

    Some tend to think of redials as a mortal sin and the watch should be burnt at the stake, but if the price is right, the rest of the watch is acceptable and the dial matches contemporary finish, font and layout and the owner is aware of it then I can't see a huge problem.
     
    Spruce and Benbradstock like this.
  6. Benbradstock Aug 22, 2019

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    440
    Good points all around. Theoretically I can understand why a redial would be OK, but it’s a dealbreaker for me. I’m a vintage guy. When I look at my watch, I want to see an old, well-made object, and a repainted dial substantially compromises that.
     
  7. Shabbaz Aug 22, 2019

    Posts
    4,898
    Likes
    17,858
    I would say 100% redial
     
    Benbradstock likes this.
  8. ConElPueblo Aug 22, 2019

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    While bad photos with digital cameras can give the effect of blurry or even thicker lines, this one is probably a redial. Dome dialed Omegas with crosshairs have the lines extending to the edge of the dial plate, here they stop at the markers. Comparing with other 166.009s it would appear that the Seamaster font is incorrect too.

    I don't think I would have considering verifying the dial authenticity after seeing the condition of the rest of the parts, though..!
     
  9. Jackyloi2110 Aug 18, 2021

    Posts
    21
    Likes
    27
    I got the original one
     
    9BC91D97-1412-4234-8991-F09E4708800A.jpeg D0ABEC46-4A02-4D63-AA62-353FD66AA774.jpeg