- Posts
- 288
- Likes
- 142
Rolex Sky-Dweller 2012
- Posts
- 288
- Likes
- 142
- Posts
- 25,980
- Likes
- 27,689
ulackfocus
·The one thing I like about these is they don't do radial flip with the numbers / numerals. It's a constant rotation - none turn over at the bottom of the dial.
- Posts
- 33,173
- Likes
- 37,901
dsio
··Ash @ ΩFThe one thing I like about these is they don't do radial flip with the numbers / numerals. It's a constant rotation - none turn over at the bottom of the dial.
- Posts
- 8,234
- Likes
- 19,415
alam
·
- Posts
- 2,343
- Likes
- 3,040
Trev
··The ArchitectI think Ashley is right. It could be the "new 3135", minus whatever module is underneath it in that photo.
The Sky-Dweller has received ton of negative remarks on ΩF and other sites, and frankly, I don't think it deserves the hate. The design itself seems a very "safe" evolution of the DDII with added complications. Although the appearance is not particularly revolutionary or exciting, I think they're still going to make quite a few sales to the Rolex crowd. Over all, I find it much more classy than something like the YMII.
Personally, I'm not a fan of the off-center GMT ring and how it cuts in to the Romans. I'm not sure why they choose to display the full ring when a single viewing window would be far cleaner and un-clutter the dial.
Edit: Also, for the same price you could get a Patek ☕
The Sky-Dweller has received ton of negative remarks on ΩF and other sites, and frankly, I don't think it deserves the hate. The design itself seems a very "safe" evolution of the DDII with added complications. Although the appearance is not particularly revolutionary or exciting, I think they're still going to make quite a few sales to the Rolex crowd. Over all, I find it much more classy than something like the YMII.
Personally, I'm not a fan of the off-center GMT ring and how it cuts in to the Romans. I'm not sure why they choose to display the full ring when a single viewing window would be far cleaner and un-clutter the dial.
Edit: Also, for the same price you could get a Patek ☕
- Posts
- 33,173
- Likes
- 37,901
dsio
··Ash @ ΩFWe're talking about the Patek comparison, but once you start looking at the JLC annual calendar comparison, the value position gets even worse, and who in their right mind would take a complicated Rolex over a complicated JLC?
- Posts
- 25,980
- Likes
- 27,689
ulackfocus
·Most of us are probably exaggerating our view. I'd certainly rather have that Rolex than a Big Bang, any Jonny Sonbul, U-boat, or whole line of Invicta watches.
- Posts
- 2,343
- Likes
- 3,040
Trev
··The ArchitectMost of us are probably exaggerating our view. I'd certainly rather have that Rolex than a Big Bang, any Jonny Sonbul, U-boat, or whole line of Invicta watches.
- Posts
- 33,173
- Likes
- 37,901
dsio
··Ash @ ΩFI'd say something but I'm not allowed to comment on Cartier anymore 🙁
- Posts
- 25,980
- Likes
- 27,689
ulackfocus
·What about Cartier? Panerai? 😀
There are a couple Cartier models I wouldn't mind having, especially a tank. And some of the older 40 mm Panerai with blue dials (069, 119/120, 282/283) are actually good looking watches as well as the black waffle dialed 40 mm Luminor. I wouldn't pay the kind of money that either brand seems to command though.
I'd say something but I'm not allowed to comment on Cartier anymore 🙁
- Posts
- 146
- Likes
- 121
124watchfan
·Not a Rollie fan but this isn't too bad. The name is ridiculous but the face isn't bad. Ditch the fluted bezel and the oversized numbers and put it into a Breguet case in white gold with a silver center ring and you have a winner. A subtle way of saying that Breguet would have done it justice.
- Posts
- 1
- Likes
- 0
Walla Musa
·Does anyone know which country has the sky dweller?
Similar threads
- Posts
- 0
- Views
- 566
- Posts
- 1
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 5K
- Posts
- 4
- Views
- 3K
