mzinski
·Ok Rolex watchmaker aficionados - I'm curious about what appears to be a regulator on the balance bridge (see circled photo below) of the calibre 3235.
As a free sprung balance, being a regulator doesn't make sense - at least to me.
Then I thought, maybe its for making micro adjustments to the beat error? While I've always found adjusting the stud on a Rolex movement to be easy and well-design - perhaps Rolex wanted to get watchmaker screwdrivers away from the stud connection for making beat error adjustments.
While considering the regulator and spring stud adjustment I briefly considered this is a mechanism for the regulating nut that controls the balance bridge height. But that was a fleeting consideration - it's one sided and doesn't make intuitive sense to adjust the height from here.
I land on a micro-adjustment mechanism for the spring stud (beat error). But can anyone confirm or deny non-scientific, uneducated guess?
As a free sprung balance, being a regulator doesn't make sense - at least to me.
Then I thought, maybe its for making micro adjustments to the beat error? While I've always found adjusting the stud on a Rolex movement to be easy and well-design - perhaps Rolex wanted to get watchmaker screwdrivers away from the stud connection for making beat error adjustments.
While considering the regulator and spring stud adjustment I briefly considered this is a mechanism for the regulating nut that controls the balance bridge height. But that was a fleeting consideration - it's one sided and doesn't make intuitive sense to adjust the height from here.
I land on a micro-adjustment mechanism for the spring stud (beat error). But can anyone confirm or deny non-scientific, uneducated guess?


