Redialed Tudor?

Posts
190
Likes
41
I've been viewing a lot of vintage watches to practice my eyes if the watch is genuine and or if it is redialed.

I stumbled upon this Tudor Prince Oysterdate. Looks genuine to me but I have a couple of concerns:
1. The letters from the words Prince Oysterdate are too wide. In other online listings, the letters are much narrower.
2. The bracelet number is 7835-17 while other listings are 7835-19.

Would appreciate any observations!

 
Posts
15,538
Likes
46,145
Asking for opinions on dials usually unleashes a barrage of comments. I’ll start. Looks good to me.
 
Posts
190
Likes
41
Asking for opinions on dials usually unleashes a barrage of comments. I’ll start. Looks good to me.
Thanks for the reply. No comment on my concerns?
 
Posts
190
Likes
41
The watch is small at around 31mm hence the 17mm bracelet.
Did Tudor have another model with 19mm bracelet?
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,998
Did Tudor have another model with 19mm bracelet?
Yes, 19mm was standard in most 34mm Tudor and Rolex’s
 
Posts
190
Likes
41
Yes, 19mm was standard in most 34mm Tudor and Rolex’s
Thanks, so that answers my #2 concern. I wonder if anyone can answer concern #1
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,998
I think it’s genuine but I would question the Swiss without the T’s for tritium unless this is a radium dial which would put it pre ‘65ish (I don’t know when Tudor went from the rose to the shield). The 31mm (midsized) tudors make for excellent ladies watches. This would be a spectacular gift if there is a lady in your life, and if not, let us know where it is and one of us can grab it for that special someone.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,998
And the fonts change periodically- ever so slightly on different eras or even different dial contractors, , so you may be looking at different dial years or makers. The lume plots look good to me which usually a tell-take on a redial.

Edit- considering this is a midsized watch, you can’t compare font sizes or placement to larger models- apples to oranges
Edited:
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,810
I don't think there is any reason for concern#1. the dial is fine. as others pointed out I would be more concerned about the diminutive size.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,998
One question I do have- the rolex’s of this era had open 9’s & 6’s, was that not the same for Tudor, or is this an incorrect date wheel?
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,810
One question I do have- the rolex’s of this era had open 9’s & 6’s, was that not the same for Tudor, or is this an incorrect date wheel?

i'm not so sure but could it be that's an ETA date wheel and not a rolex movement date wheel?
 
Posts
190
Likes
41
Thanks so much for the info. A wealth of knowledge we have here! I was planning to buy it, asking price is $800 which I think is reasonable. Learned so much on this thread. Thank you everyone! @janice&fred @JwRosenthal @Canuck
 
Posts
4,822
Likes
12,208
I think it’s genuine but I would question the Swiss without the T’s for tritium unless this is a radium dial which would put it pre ‘65ish (I don’t know when Tudor went from the rose to the shield). The 31mm (midsized) tudors make for excellent ladies watches. This would be a spectacular gift if there is a lady in your life, and if not, let us know where it is and one of us can grab it for that special someone.

Thanks, so that answers my #2 concern. I wonder if anyone can answer concern #1

I am no expert on Tudor fonts, but it looks like the 6 o'clock lume plot partially covers the Swiss. That seems wrong to me.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,998
I am no expert on Tudor fonts, but it looks like the 6 o'clock lume plot partially covers the Swiss. That seems wrong to me.
My OPD has the same thing- it’s normal.