Hello all,

I am not 100% sure that this is not a redial. It could just be an older faded dial? The dial still has it's silver background. What does everybody think?

 

Ohh, It's hard to see with unclear pictures, Could you give some more?

 

I know... That's all there is to work with unfortunately.

 

Looks correct. Thin lines on the cross hair, correct placement of "Swiss Made" and no crooked markers.

 

Based on the provided photo it looks original.

 

Anything seem to be alright beside seamaster word. Imo there is rewritten on. "eamaster". It's thicker

 

That's what I was thinking too. Everything seems right except for the Seamaster. Especially against these photos posted in another thread.

 

You should plug your phone in before it dies!

 

Ahahah! Was straight onto it!

 

You can trust Omegaforums to always give you helpful info!

 

If the -eamaster is a redial would it stand out like a sore thumb in person do you think? Would you still buy it as a collector? It kind of bothers me if it is...

 

The gap between the S and -eamaster seems larger than the photos of the originals posted... It bothers me too...