"rare" Deville /constellation model

Posts
25
Likes
4
Dear Members, I’m having trouble identifying this Omega Deville (maybe constellation Deville) lady model but my search was not successful.
Every part is signed, and seems factory but I can not enclosed the opposite .

i'am not sure about the age or model number With a 1455 quartz werk 48134471
all numbers and "identification data" available on the following pictures.

Any additional information about the watch is welcomed and greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
 
Posts
8,514
Likes
60,869
Welcome

What specific information do you seek that is not already seen in the pictures?

Are you the buyer or seller?
 
Posts
311
Likes
185
It's this authentic ? Never seen in my life these "not sharp" fonts at Omega watches.. All the numbers are presents but seems written by hand..
Hope it will be from the not "focus" pictures.
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,617
This is the watch that matches the reference number in your case back photo. I'm old and don't see as well as I used to but they don't appear to be the same watch.
https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-constellation-omega-da-795-0803
omega-vintage-constellation-da-795-0803-l.jpg
 
Posts
25
Likes
4
Welcome

What specific information do you seek that is not already seen in the pictures?
- if there is any ref. no.- or egzact year or model name for this.
I haven't seen any out there.

Are you the buyer or seller?
Thank you, I "might be" the buyer

thank you for your help
 
Posts
25
Likes
4
Welcome

What specific information do you seek that is not already seen in the pictures?

Are you the buyer or seller?

Thank you for your reply,
 
Posts
25
Likes
4
It's this authentic ? Never seen in my life these "not sharp" fonts at Omega watches.. All the numbers are presents but seems written by hand..
Hope it will be from the not "focus" pictures.

Thank you .
i'am sure it's more about the terrible shaking pics. and de focus. however it has been made by me with an i13 and raw file. but it seems like a cartoon filter on tik tok 🙁

regarding the authenticity - I never seen a "similar" model, and surprised when saw the hairline cross the V- in de Ville.

thank you
 
Posts
17,994
Likes
37,591
I can't see anything wrong with it.
The 795 reference number is OK (ladies bracelet watch/electronic/water resistant).
Not every model is shown in the OVDB and not being able to see the full reference clearly I can only go by the first three numbers.
Caseback markings aren't unusual for that period, case made by Louis Lang SA in Porrentruy, Switzerland.
Movement serial dates to about 1985.
The De Ville emblem on the caseback was introduced in 1981 and at that time there were some unusual models being produced by Omega (also some crap ones).

So, it has nothing to do with Constellations, it is genuine and it is rare.
Note: Rarity has no relationship to desirability or high value.
 
Posts
25
Likes
4
I can't see anything wrong with it.
The 795 reference number is OK (ladies bracelet watch/electronic/water resistant).
Not every model is shown in the OVDB and not being able to see the full reference clearly I can only go by the first three numbers.
Caseback markings aren't unusual for that period, case made by Louis Lang SA in Porrentruy, Switzerland.
Movement serial dates to about 1985.
The De Ville emblem on the caseback was introduced in 1981 and at that time there were some unusual models being produced by Omega (also some crap ones).

So, it has nothing to do with Constellations, it is genuine and it is rare.
Note: Rarity has no relationship to desirability or high value.


Thank you for your detailed answer
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,617
I can't see anything wrong with it.
The 795 reference number is OK (ladies bracelet watch/electronic/water resistant).
Not every model is shown in the OVDB and not being able to see the full reference clearly I can only go by the first three numbers.
Caseback markings aren't unusual for that period, case made by Louis Lang SA in Porrentruy, Switzerland.
Movement serial dates to about 1985.
The De Ville emblem on the caseback was introduced in 1981 and at that time there were some unusual models being produced by Omega (also some crap ones).

So, it has nothing to do with Constellations, it is genuine and it is rare.
Note: Rarity has no relationship to desirability or high value.
You're not seeing 795.0803?