- Posts
- 1,883
- Likes
- 8,099
Pun
·If I remember correctly, Omega sold the rights to use the name Flightmaster to Seiko.
Railmaster vs Explorer?
- Posts
- 208
- Likes
- 311
cholack
·I remember musing with my OB rep about cool it would be if the Ranchero would get reissued. He said it’s extremely unlikely to ever happen.
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 49
Jmango
·Explorer vote for me. Then again, I may be biased as I am lucky enough to have a black and polar Exp II 42mm. Not exactly the Exp reference in question here I realize, but still...
- Posts
- 16
- Likes
- 118
jburson250
·Can I vote for both?
- Posts
- 223
- Likes
- 190
- Posts
- 1,368
- Likes
- 835
watch3s
·went with the 39 railmaster to avoid the explorer 1, ended up buying the explorer 1 in 14270 anyway. shame the 36 rm is so hard to find.
- Posts
- 133
- Likes
- 62
mk2rick
·Hi everyone,
I am hoping to resurrect a previous debate, which I have a hard time settling! I currently own an Omega Railmaster 2503.52 (the previous re-edition) and have owned it for about 8 months. It truly is a great 'vintage' piece with many unique design attributes. However the rugged and sleek design of the newest Rolex explorer (214270) are tempting me to trade it in.
I love the refined design and relative rarity of the Railmaster, however the Explorer offers a newer design, with a very robust case and bracelet.
Thoughts? Any guidance is much appreciated! See pics below.
Cheers,
Viddy
- Posts
- 377
- Likes
- 2,950
Damo
·
- Posts
- 401
- Likes
- 349
nkhandekar
·If its between a new explorer and a trilogy Railmaster, I would go for the railmaster, its such a good looking watch, and even holds up against the explorer 1016.
Between your current Railmaster and a new Explorer, I think its not much of a difference.
Between your current Railmaster and a new Explorer, I think its not much of a difference.
- Posts
- 1,443
- Likes
- 3,808
killer67
·Current railmaster if modern is the only choice. If possible an early 14270 is better if considering older pcs
- Posts
- 213
- Likes
- 296
- Posts
- 133
- Likes
- 62
- Posts
- 20
- Likes
- 12
WRATH OF KANE
·I would recommend that you consider some of the Seamaster chronograph. Some of them have a lot of Railmaster styling, like this one:
- Posts
- 1,259
- Likes
- 1,750
DIV
·If there was a modern 36 or 37mm Explorer, then this would really be a hard choice for me. The 39mm 214270 Mark 2 I had for a year was ALMOST perfect, but it was just too big and bold for my taste and I don’t regret selling it.
I can’t justify the cost of a 14270/114270 for that outdated bracelet clasp, glossy black dial, non-lumed number markers and inferior (as compared to the Omega 8806) movement.
I can’t justify the cost of a 14270/114270 for that outdated bracelet clasp, glossy black dial, non-lumed number markers and inferior (as compared to the Omega 8806) movement.
- Posts
- 12
- Likes
- 4
ocwatchclub
·I'm getting the railmaster 2503.52 today, I personally prefer the rail more. Regardless, you will make a good decision 😀
- Posts
- 133
- Likes
- 62
mk2rick
·If there was a modern 36 or 37mm Explorer, then this would really be a hard choice for me. The 39mm 214270 Mark 2 I had for a year was ALMOST perfect, but it was just too big and bold for my taste and I don’t regret selling it.
I can’t justify the cost of a 14270/114270 for that outdated bracelet clasp, glossy black dial, non-lumed number markers and inferior (as compared to the Omega 8806) movement.
- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 2
eingram141
·Well it looks like I am not alone, glad I found this thread. It seems like its been waiting her for many of us.
Ok so ive tried on the 36mm railmaster 2504 and loved it but have not been able to try the 36mm explorer. I found the 36mm raily to wear large due to its large dial that comes all the way out.
Question: For those who have tried both, does the explorer 36mm also wear a bit large? Thanks
Ok so ive tried on the 36mm railmaster 2504 and loved it but have not been able to try the 36mm explorer. I found the 36mm raily to wear large due to its large dial that comes all the way out.
Question: For those who have tried both, does the explorer 36mm also wear a bit large? Thanks
- Posts
- 431
- Likes
- 1,492
OmeGez
·I think the Rolex Oyster 116000 with Arabic dial gets completely over looked - such a simple and amazing watch. It suits the lack of the Mercedes hour hand too. 36mm... what’s not to like..especially the value! I believe it uses a Sub movement also.
I’d definitely pick that (unless your wanting a stainless sports for value retention).
I’d definitely pick that (unless your wanting a stainless sports for value retention).
- Posts
- 2,326
- Likes
- 1,884
VetPsychWars
·My biggest gripe with Rolex are the stick hands. The "Mercedes" is no better. Just cannot stand stick hands.
Tom
Tom
- Posts
- 1,024
- Likes
- 6,093
RI Omega Fan
·My biggest gripe with Rolex are the stick hands. The "Mercedes" is no better. Just cannot stand stick hands.
Tom
