Lurk41
·For me it would be: 39mm Explorer <<<< RM < 36mm Explorer << Denim RM (this one is just amazing)
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
The true winners here are the lucky gentlemen who own both the Railmaster 60th LE and the Explorer 36mm.* This thread reminds me that owning the RMLE is not enough and that I need to get an Explorer 36 sometime in the future.
Here’s the groom waiting for his bride.
* - vintage collectors who have both the CK-2914 and the 1060 are LEGENDARY!
IMHO the explorer 1 is a snoozfest...the railmaster wins everytime...but explorer 2 vs what omega gmt ?
I had a titanium Seamaster Pro Auto, and always wanted a SeaProGMT because it has a lot going for it, and isnt a stinky rolex with now no independent wm able to buy parts...Omega rulez!
I must admit I love an explorer, but I lprefer the vintage ones. I think the styling of the railmaster in this particular pairing make it a winner for me.
all the new beefy case lugs on their watches are very un-stylish
I like both, imo the explorer 36 wears smaller and looks slightly smaller. I feel more connected to the RM since my grandfather was a hard working engine driver all his life, I still battle some rolex stigma but that might wear off eventually. Tough call, you love different things about them.