Forums Latest Members
  1. Lessismore Pro Constellation picker-outter! Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    287
    Likes
    164
    Maybe a ref 2943.... but anyways I still think is a redial...
     
  2. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Date is tricky
     
    constelation.jpg
  3. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    2943 looks good
     
    2943.jpg
  4. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    In your one I was right automatic letter to small
     
  5. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    No I could be wrong my face all gold yours not
     
  6. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    As frustrating as this is, this is also half the FUN!
     
  7. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    2954 with date
     
  8. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    2954 with date?
     
  9. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    2954 date
     
    2954.jpg
  10. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    2988 OR 2954
     
  11. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    To put @PatrickJ out of his misery, the list of errors in the dial that @mondodec found is below. For people who want to keep going, try and scroll past this post!








    The uppercase lettering is not properly balanced against the applied Omega logo - notice that the 'Automatic' is not evenly balanced between the O in Omega and the A in Omega (It is too far to the left)

    The 12 minute marker is too bold and doesnt match the others. The 19 minute marker is not fully printed. The printed markers at 4 'oclock and five o'clock particularly are not in the centre of the applied hour markers.

    The As in calendar should be boxed As as they are in 'Automatic'.

    The D is not fully printed in calendar.
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  12. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    8,675
    the date surround window looks like glued in......kind regards. achim
     
  13. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Also inside the O in Omega there looks like they are deposits of glue
     
  14. Giff2577 Quick with the tools! Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    930
    Likes
    3,718
    Does not pass MOY and Swiss Made seems too tall. The ll's in Constellation look almost too tall. Second hand extends a little too far past the second track. The possibly correct but possibly not correct (according to vintage ads) seamaster 4 lobe crown.
     
  15. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    2943 it is!
     
  16. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
    PatrickJ likes this.
  17. PatrickJ Apr 19, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Ha ha so it was a 2943
     
  18. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    5,160
    Likes
    7,890
    likewise this thread is great too -more please!
     
  19. omegastar Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    1,836
    Likes
    5,323
    For me the first thing I look at is the SWISS MADE for most redials don't have the point of the A cut. Then the text is very fat.... omega 008.JPG
     
    Fost likes this.
  20. TNTwatch Apr 27, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    upload_2015-4-27_12-32-7.png
    It wasn't mentioned so we don't know, but if the watch in question is of solid gold, there should be double ref. numbers 2943/2954.