Posts 122 Likes 64 default ·Mar 20, 2018 seller asked me to remove pictures as I ended up not taking the watch Edited: Mar 21, 2018
Posts 2,156 Likes 24,778 Baz9614 ·Mar 20, 2018 While I’d like to see a higher resolution pic, from what I can see I’ll add a +1 to the above
Posts 1,072 Likes 1,482 Dgercp ·Mar 20, 2018 Looks like a correct 1966 with correct type C bezel and very nice. Is there something about it that concerns you?
Posts 1,854 Likes 5,412 omegastar ·Mar 21, 2018 It might have been relumed. The big triangle is quite large on the right side. Better pics are necessary for assessment.
Posts 2,156 Likes 24,778 Baz9614 ·Mar 21, 2018 omegastar It might have been relumed. The big triangle is quite large on the right side. Better pics are necessary for assessment. This pic appears to show the correct pinhole found in some original dials?
Posts 1,854 Likes 5,412 omegastar ·Mar 21, 2018 default asked for better pictures and this is the best I could get Looks ok, no ? No pinhole to me.
Posts 2,156 Likes 24,778 Baz9614 ·Mar 21, 2018 omegastar Looks ok, no ? No pinhole to me. Not all had a pinhole, it seems later dials did not have them. The close up pic you’ve provided is a little blurry, but the dial in previous pic (non close up) looks good to me from what I can see