Omega DeVille 165.029

Hello everyone, in my opinion the writing "twenty-four 24 jewels" has been recreated incorrectly. I am attaching some photos, do you think the writing is original or not?

Thnak you

 

It's ok

 

Here's a photo from my 551 movement. Like yours, the text seems slightly uneven, but I presume it's original.

 

But the drops of water/liquid on the movement - not so much...

 

I tell you what my impressions are,
above the writing there are those signs of abrasion with drops, (it makes me think that we were working on) if you look carefully at the number (4) it seems that the end is too short, and finally, the letters look a bit bandy.

What do you think of these details that I have described?

 

Makes me think you are over-analyzing something that isn't really an issue.

 

if it's not a problem because then "maybe" they created the writing?

 

your writings are engraved correctly

 

Here's my 552 24 jewels movement

 

Is it because we all like to think that everything should be 100% spot on, which also includes the above?

 

because I believe it is fair to sell un-retouched items and not to deceive people

 

How much do you know about multi-head pantograph engravers from the 1960s?

 

I think we've been here before....
Providing the vendor makes it clear that the watch has, in some way, been refurbished, I can see no problem with the purchase, you either take it or leave it.
Most people restoring a vintage barn-find car would plan for refurbishment.
I suspect that although serious watch collectors will insist on un-restored watches, many of us take a more relaxed view if the watch is well preserved and carefully restored.

 

I do not know enough, I understand that many years ago the precision of today is not waxed but I just wanted to understand if the writing was retouched or not, that's all

 

there is the possibility of changing the balance bridge of the movement?