"Professional"

Posts
2,680
Likes
9,840
a few quotes I found while searching this same topic:
"Curiously, Omega only learned about the Speedmaster’s journey into space after seeing a photograph of Ed White taken during America’s first spacewalk as part of the Gemini 4 mission in June of 1965. The watch was attached to the arm via a long nylon strap secured with Velcro.
Following the discovery, Omega decided to add the word "Professional" to the product name, thus becoming Omega Speedmaster Professional. The new reference number was 145.012."

https://www.timeandwatches.com/p/history-of-omega-speedmaster.html


"The 105.012 and 145.012 are actually the references used by Apollo 11 astronauts. It is also the model that has the a-symmetrical case due to the use of crown guards. These crown guards were added after NASA commented on the risk of knocking off the pushers due to rough use. The 105.012 and 145.012 are considered to be the certified models and used Professional on the dials since 1966. It is verified that Buzz Aldrin wore a 105.012 when he set foot on the Moon while Michael Collins wore his 145.012 when waiting in the capsule for Aldrin and Armstrong to get back. Armstrong didn’t wear his watch as the Bulova board clock broke down, as the legend goes."
 
Posts
18,132
Likes
27,425
a few quotes I found while searching this same topic:
"Curiously, Omega only learned about the Speedmaster’s journey into space after seeing a photograph of Ed White taken during America’s first spacewalk as part of the Gemini 4 mission in June of 1965. The watch was attached to the arm via a long nylon strap secured with Velcro.
Following the discovery, Omega decided to add the word "Professional" to the product name, thus becoming Omega Speedmaster Professional. The new reference number was 145.012."

https://www.timeandwatches.com/p/history-of-omega-speedmaster.html


"The 105.012 and 145.012 are actually the references used by Apollo 11 astronauts. It is also the model that has the a-symmetrical case due to the use of crown guards. These crown guards were added after NASA commented on the risk of knocking off the pushers due to rough use. The 105.012 and 145.012 are considered to be the certified models and used Professional on the dials since 1966. It is verified that Buzz Aldrin wore a 105.012 when he set foot on the Moon while Michael Collins wore his 145.012 when waiting in the capsule for Aldrin and Armstrong to get back. Armstrong didn’t wear his watch as the Bulova board clock broke down, as the legend goes."
Except the 105.012 predated the 145.012 and had professional on it. The time and tide article has a few things wrong with it.
 
Posts
2,680
Likes
9,840
do you mean Time and Watches?

these are two different articles.

The Time and Watches article also includes two advertisements that pre-date the moon landing
 
Posts
272
Likes
224
Eric Wind has stated that the Professional moniker has nothing to do with NASA and was just part of their process in trying to improve the watch by adding crown guards (check out the HODINKEE ‘Reference Points’ on the Speedmaster). In addition, Jim Ragan put out his ‘Request for Proposal’ to all the watch companies in 1964 and Omega submitted the 105.003 (the Ed White) that same year (https://www.fratellowatches.com/speedmaster-became-moonwatch/) so the whole story about Omega seeing the watch on his wrist and deciding to call it Professional is utter nonsense. They knew it was being flight qualified. Omega simply realized that if you smacked a Speedmaster crown against something, it might break off. The redesign of the case coincided nicely with a name change on the 105.012.
 
Posts
368
Likes
452
I'm no expert on any of this stuff by a long shot, so don't take this comment as me being superior to anyone else ... but damn it's amazing how much wrong information just gets sent off into "space" on the internet with these watches. I'm a professional (haha) journalist so it blows my mind how people just basically make shit up and publish it. Next thing you know, it becomes "fact." It's unreal.
 
Posts
1,301
Likes
2,576
I'm no expert on any of this stuff by a long shot, so don't take this comment as me being superior to anyone else ... but damn it's amazing how much wrong information just gets sent off into "space" on the internet with these watches. I'm a professional (haha) journalist so it blows my mind how people just basically make shit up and publish it. Next thing you know, it becomes "fact." It's unreal.
Yep, trust the Speedmaster bible: https://omegaforums.net/threads/mwo-moonwatch-only-edition-3.98952/ , not fake news on the internet.
 
Posts
10,324
Likes
16,161
do you mean Time and Watches?

these are two different articles.

The Time and Watches article also includes two advertisements that pre-date the moon landing
It hardly matters, both articles are factually inaccurate. Professional was first put on the dial in 1963, so has nothing to do with NASA as it predated the EW walk and the NASA selection process, which used a straight lug watch. As already noted, it relates to making the pushers less susceptible to damage. Omega also uses the word on other series too, such as the Seamaster Professional (Bond Watch) and indeed the Pre-Bond before that. It is purely a marketing tag and the meaning changes every time. Some say that it denotes a NASA certified watch, yet the Moonphase SpeedyMoon has it, some say it denotes manual or auto vs Quartz yet all the Pre-Bonds have it. Its just a tag.

I agree with OP that it's to do with NASA approval for flight qualified watch. And that's only on hesalite crystal Moonwatch and not for sapphire crystal Speedmaster watch.
And yet the sapphire sandwich says Professional on the dial...
Edited:
 
Posts
194
Likes
150
So, if the added naming of "Professional" is just marketing, is it any better than the equally vacuous "Superlative"?
 
Posts
18,132
Likes
27,425
So, if the added naming of "Professional" is just marketing, is it any better than the equally vacuous "Superlative"?
It’s marketing... but it does denote something real. Same with Prospex.
 
Posts
886
Likes
471
So, if the added naming of "Professional" is just marketing, is it any better than the equally vacuous "Superlative"?

Of course, the "SUPERLATIVE" designation was pure marketing at work.

But since the latest accuracy standard that is now applicable since the colour of the hangtags were changed, it does indeed actually mean something.