Pressure testing a "Watchco" SM300

Posts
67
Likes
39
Thanks for posting very interesting to see how it’s done.
 
Posts
342
Likes
342
Great pictures and explanation. Learn something new everyday!
 
Posts
173
Likes
184
Thanks for posting these amazing tests and the results of those... Where can i buy an Omega seamaster 300 WatchCo??
 
Posts
10
Likes
5
Very cool to see the process and makes me appreciate the money spent on servicing/maintenance.
 
Posts
29
Likes
66
That is so cool, Archer! Thanks for the education.
 
Posts
521
Likes
1,261
Great info again Al. Confusing though. Mr Minit only took 15 minutes when I was watching him the other day test some guys watch. He must have the latest tools.
 
Posts
134
Likes
156
thanks Archer for taking the time to share your knowledge with us. I am always excited when I come across your post. May I ask if there is a certain age past which you would not subject a vintage diver to the wet test?
 
Posts
29,117
Likes
75,251
thanks Archer for taking the time to share your knowledge with us. I am always excited when I come across your post. May I ask if there is a certain age past which you would not subject a vintage diver to the wet test?

I don't really have an age in mind, but doing this or not would depend more on the condition of the watch. So for example if the watch has pitted surfaces where the O-ring seals, damage where the crystal seats, etc. (things that would impact the likelihood of failure) then those would be the determining factors rather than the age.

Keep in mind that the case is tested empty initially, so no risk in the first test, but when the movement/dial/hands are in the case, more caution is required.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
16
Likes
19
For my buddy Stas...and anyone else who may be interested, even though they don't dive...

I didn't want to post anything until I found these photos...but I knew I had tested at least one of these before, so after some digging, here you go. I'll start off by stating this is the second time the case was tested, because all of what you will see here is done with the case empty first, in case there is a failure. Then once the empty case passes, the movement is installed, and the test is repeated, so this is that second test. Start by using the dry testing machine, set to the dive watch program - it will use a -0.7 bar vacuum, and then a +10 bar pressure to test the watch, while carefully measuring the deflection of the case:



The watch passes both tests:



Now off to another room where the high pressure wet testing equipment is located:



The watch is placed in the testing chamber, and the chamber is filled with water:



The chamber is closed, and the watch is left with no additional pressure applied for 30 minutes - note that I hadn't wound the watch, so it wasn't running:



After 30 minutes the pressure is increased. This particular equipment is capable of testing to 125 Bar, but that is for very rigid dive watches with thick sapphire crystals. In this case I used 25 Bar, so 200 m rated depth +25% safety margin as per Omega standards for this kind of testing of their proper dive watches - here is the pressure gauge:



Shot of the watch in the chamber and you can see the pressure gauge also:



I leave it at this pressure for one hour, then lower the pressure back down to zero, and leave it in the chamber for another 30 minutes:



The watch is then removed from the testing chamber:



Placed on a heating plate that will bring the temperature of the watch to 47 degrees C - this takes 30 minutes:



After 30 minutes have elapsed, a drop of cool water is placed on the crystal, and left for one minute:



It is then wiped away, and the crystal is examined under a loupe to ensure that no condensation has formed on the underside - seeing none, the watch has passed:



et voilà

Cheers, Al
takes more time than expected!! great review
 
Posts
57
Likes
103
Like many I always wondered how this was made....the only hard thing to digest is the possibility of a failure during the test...But I supose your initial tests with an empty case will make that harder to happen
 
Posts
10,601
Likes
51,674
For those that often complain at the costs of having a watch properly serviced and tested just imagine what this little piece of kit costs and then add all the other essentials to carry out the job properly.

Nice post 👍
Plus the expertise required on the small stems, gears springs etc. in a previous life I worked on large machinery but when you get down to small parts you really need to take your time it’s so easy to break or strip something. I have a lot of respect for Watchmaker’s
 
Posts
29,117
Likes
75,251
Like many I always wondered how this was made....the only hard thing to digest is the possibility of a failure during the test...But I supose your initial tests with an empty case will make that harder to happen

I always let people know that there is a risk with this test, but yes testing the empty case first helps mitigate that risk.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
10,240
Likes
16,039
Well with the SM300 ironically, the 300=200m

Not being controversial, that is what the watch was actually rated for. Not everyone knows this! Well Al clearly does since that is what he tested in post 1
Edited:
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,981
Well with the SM300 ironically, the 300=200m

Not being controversial, that is what the watch was actually rated for. Not everyone knows this!
I’m going back to bed 🙄
 
Posts
10,240
Likes
16,039
I’m going back to bed 🙄
Don't forget to set your alarm for tonight's Sn*rk*l high jinks!
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,981
Don't forget to set your alarm for tonight's Sn*rk*l high jinks!
Perhaps a new thread where we explore the fruits of the Rhône region every time someone says Plongeur!