As I said, I could be wrong, but here are the differences I can see between the 3:
- The Rolex crown that is laser printed on the crystal at 6 (see pictures) is only visible on one of them. This isn't supposed to be visible to the naked eye, let alone a bad-taken wristshot.
- The font on Oyster perpetual date seems to be crooked and of less quality in some way. Maybe thicker.
- The inner engraving on the bezel is not equal in all of the 3 examples. See how the R isn't positioned on the same place in the allegedly fake.
If I were to be the buyer, I'll definately pass on it. There are several irregularities that may lead to think it's fake, or at least, a franken watch.
That being said, that's my opinion on the matter and all the suggestion and educational point-outs are well received.
Best,
Javi.
Click to expand...