Actually, believe it or not I do not like the PP Nautilus at all, I find its squarer case and vertical lined dial really too frozen in the Abba 70s. In terms of Genta inspired designs I prefer the Royal Oak 15400ST and the IWC 3239 and I think they are both modern designs which do not look out of place in 2016. The IWC 3239 looks very fresh.
Now what would be more absurd (remembering that in Rio I do not have a reliable grey or pre-owned market):
1. Paying US$18K retail on an in-house AP 15400 Stainless Steel watch, with a lovely decorated movement, but which will have significant services costs during its lifecyle and that will be used effectively only as a "formal business watch" because it is not exactly a "daily beater" and will compete with my Reverso DuoFace and Tresor for that role.
2. Paying US$6.600 retail on an IWC 3239 which I actually prefer the design versus the AP (subjective this, but I find the IWC is more versatile and tool inspired while the AP is beautiful but a bit too fragile for me), flies under the radar and can be used taking kids to school, doing shopping etc. and has a reliable accurate movement that can be serviced by any watchmaker + the bonus of Ingenieur brand which ties nicely to my Engineering background.
There are many IWC designs that I like but I find many of their watches too big and their in-house movements have been often questioned in terms of precision and reliability. The IWC 3239 is unique in their range and the ETA/Sellita movement I see as a bonus for an IWC watch + ticks off all the boxes I need.
If there was any feeling on my part that I would be buying the 3239 as an intermediate stepping stone to the AP I would not purchase it, as living in Rio I do have a tough time flipping watches in a secure fashion. No, I want the 3239 because I think it is very cool and I really could not care less as to whether it will be admired by third-parties or considered a "poor man´s" Royal Oak
Cheers.
PS.Part 3 is coming...too many "honey do" items today
Click to expand...