Forums Latest Members
  1. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    26,992
    Likes
    32,710
  2. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Also, what does "Case Back have the Serial different to the Movement" mean?
     
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    26,992
    Likes
    32,710
    That's why I'm curious as to Achim's thoughts as I've never known if the serial on the back is some sort of issue number in the military inventory sense or if its meant to be the movement serial repeated, or if its just a case number.
     
  4. sohail Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    445
    Likes
    155
    If u notice it's actually a 2914 but the case back is 135.004 which is not correct for this watch . It's a mix and match
     
  5. cristos71 Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    7,157
    Likes
    32,938
    I´m absolutely no expert on these but it looks to me like this could be a simple case of watchmakers swapsy during servicing of multiple FAP Railmasters. Otherwise what´s the probable chance of having a FAP 2914 missing a caseback together with a FAP 135.004 caseback missing the rest and then making a watch out of them ?
     
  6. Steve1haggart Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    987
    Likes
    1,177
    It certainly looks a little bit mix and match Railmaster ...I'm no expert by any shape or form but I've been emailing the seller he's happy to sell for $4700 don't know if this is a good price or not .
     
  7. CajunTiger Cajuns and Gators can't read newspapers! Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    2,678
    Likes
    9,741
    Thats a huge red flag.
     
  8. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    @michael e

    He is the current expert on PAF in my book
     
  9. Steve1haggart Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    987
    Likes
    1,177
    Bidding is reaching the $3k mark someone wants this watch really badly.
     
  10. CajunTiger Cajuns and Gators can't read newspapers! Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    2,678
    Likes
    9,741
    If its legit, its worth 5X that...so if the seller is willing to take $4700 what does this say?
     
  11. michael e Still learning. Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,667
    Totally agree with the above.
    2914-5 with correct marking "PAF" on the movement and correct serial range. The case back is from a PAF 135.004 this is still correct but not for this watch. (135.004s do not have "PAF" on the movement)
    Somewhere out there is a PAF 135.004 with a 2914-5 case back on probably.
    I would buy this watch just for the dial and case or in the hope I find the 135.004 with the 2914-5 case back :thumbsup:
     
    sohail likes this.
  12. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    So, who is gonna grab it?
     
  13. michael e Still learning. Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,667
    Me or someone else :)
    It will be good to see it go to the end, I haven't auctioned a complete matching numbers one so it will be nice to see what it goes for with wrong case back.
     
    oddboy and Spacefruit like this.
  14. Fritz genuflects before the mighty quartzophobe Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    3,817
    Likes
    15,990
    My kick at the can:

    If Omega machined "seamaster" into the back cover, wouldn't they would do it in the correct font, its an anal corporate thing.

    If the military customer did the machining of the back cover why would they bother with the word "seamaster", they would put on the important stuff: PAF, item number, maybe "watch-waterproof", a contract or military specification number but not seamaster, the military doesn't care about trade names.

    Looks to me like somebody has access to a machine to engrave metal and is making "military" timepieces in his spare time......

    I know absolutely nothing about the PAF Omega watches, but if the back is questionable, how much of the rest of the watch is?
     
  15. michael e Still learning. Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,667
    #
    I cannot see anything questionable about the watch apart from the mismatched case back.
    I have the same engraving too, rare but nothing unusual.
    [​IMG]
     
    TH14 and pitpro like this.
  16. pitpro Likes the game. Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    I thought 135.004 caseback is supposed to look like this:
    PAF_rail_back-Franco.jpg PAF_insideback-Franco.jpg
     
    watchyouwant likes this.
  17. michael e Still learning. Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,667
    I have found two types of 135.004 case backs as above , the in the 21xxxxx range also had a T SWISS T dial as opposed to SWISS only as found on all the others I have owned.
     
  18. sohail Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    445
    Likes
    155
     
  19. sohail Feb 28, 2016

    Posts
    445
    Likes
    155
    The case back for 2914 should have the same movement number as this watch movement number . In my opinion it will be impossible to find . Micheal is absolutely right in his comments.
     
  20. Steve1haggart Feb 29, 2016

    Posts
    987
    Likes
    1,177
    listing has ended..... how got the watch ? someone from OF ?