ErichPryde
··Seamasters ForeverREDACTED
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
As a big Obama fan (I took my daughters to the rallies and my oldest got to shake his hand), I was disappointed by some of the same results (without agreeing completely with your analysis. For example, if he had stood up for Crimea, things might be different in Ukraine now, but we almost might have been in a war earlier.)
Regardless, there is simply no comparison between prior administrations and Trump. Imagine if Obama had issued his own bitcoin trading floor and written executive orders to have no oversight, or arrested a judge, or used the DOJ to investigate his opponents, etc, etc? Republicans would have rightfully gone nuts. What happened to states rights, less federal government? From where I sit, it looks like freedom is only for straight, white, evangelicals.
Why stop at Obama (although for some reason Obama pisses off Republicans alot)? Why not Reagan and Clinton? Keep going, there're many obvious failures.
It is intellectually dishonest to not acknowledge that Trump is acting unconstitutional (illegally) in a manner that this country has likely never seen, outside of a few extremes inacted during the civil war and WWII.
It's like his supporters are afraid to acknowledge any of Trump's failings. Any "what about.." are ludicrous.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akq0xeu-RHE&ved=2ahUKEwiqv4Kl84yNAxWbFTQIHZUhFsUQz40FegQIDxAJ&usg=AOvVaw0Z6cFp81YykJTS_TCZ3Q1m
You are badly misinformed. If you'd like me to provide numerous factual sources that confirm the essence of what I wrote, I'd be happy to do so, though privately, as I don't want to derail the thread further.
If you have something to share I think you should post it.
The analysis shows that the Maidan combined elements of mass protest, political revolution, coup, and US-led regime change. The last two were dominant in political transition.The Yanukovych government was overthrown not by peaceful mass protests but by means of the false-flag Maidan massacre of the Maidan protesters and the police and assassination attempts.There is overwhelming evidence that the massacre and assassination attempts were perpetrated with covert involvement of small number of the Maidan oligarchic leadership and the far-right members. Various evidence shows that the US government was involved in the political transition in Ukraine during the Maidan in order to replace the pro-Russian government with the pro-Western government and turn Ukraine into a client state in order to use it to contain Russia.
We are not at the 1-year anniversary of the war, as the Western governments and media claim. This is the 9-year anniversary of the war. And that makes a big difference.
The war began with the violent overthrow of Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014, a coup that was overtly and covertly backed by the United States government (see also here). From 2008 onward, the United States pushed NATO enlargement to Ukraine and Georgia. The 2014 coup of Yanukovych was in the service of NATO expansion.
We must keep this relentless drive towards NATO expansion in context. The US and Germany explicitly and repeatedly promised Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not enlarge “one inch eastward” after Gorbachev disbanded the Soviet military alliance known as the Warsaw Pact. The entire premise of NATO enlargement was a violation of agreements reached with Soviet Union, and therefore with the continuation state of Russia.
The neocons have pushed NATO enlargement because they seek to surround Russia in the Black Sea region, akin to the aims of Britain and France in the Crimean War (1853-56). US strategist Zbigniew Brzezinski described Ukraine as the “geographical pivot” of Eurasia. If the US could surround Russia in the Black Sea region, and incorporate Ukraine into the US military alliance, Russia’s ability to project power in the Eastern Mediterranean, the Middle East, and globally would disappear, or so goes the theory.
Of course, Russia saw this not only as a general threat, but as a specific threat of putting advanced armaments right up to Russia’s border. This was especially ominous after the US unilaterally abandoned the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002, which, according to Russia, posed a direct threat to Russian national security.
During his presidency (2010-2014), Yanukovych sought military neutrality, precisely to avoid a civil war or proxy war in Ukraine. This was a very wise and prudent choice for Ukraine, but it stood in the way of the U.S. neoconservative obsession with NATO enlargement. When protests broke out against Yanukovych at the end of 2013 upon the delay of the signing of an accession roadmap with the EU, the United States took the opportunity to escalate the protests into a coup, which culminated in Yanukovych’s overthrow in February 2014.
The US meddled relentlessly and covertly in the protests, urging them onward even as right-wing Ukrainian nationalist paramilitaries entered the scene. US NGOs spent vast sums to finance the protests and the eventual overthrow. This NGO financing has never come to light.
Three people intimately involved in the US effort to overthrow Yanukovych were Victoria Nuland, then the Assistant Secretary of State, now Under-Secretary of State; Jake Sullivan, then the security advisor to VP Joe Biden, and now the US National Security Advisor to President Biden; and VP Biden, now President. Nuland was famously caught on the phone with the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, planning the next government in Ukraine, and without allowing any second thoughts by the Europeans (“fυck the EU,” in Nuland’s crude phrase caught on tape).
The intercepted conversation reveals the depth of the Biden-Nuland-Sullivan planning. Nuland says, “So on that piece Geoff, when I wrote the note Sullivan's come back to me VFR [direct to me], saying you need Biden and I said probably tomorrow for an atta-boy and to get the deets [details] to stick. So, Biden's willing.”
I have reams of material to support what I wrote, and posting anything other than a tiny percentage of it would derail the thread further.
However, here are a couple of examples, and from Western sources. The first, excerpted below, is from a 38 page paper authored by Ivan Katchanovski, ...
Justify this.
I don't understand why Trump got elected but it sure as shit wasn't because Kamala and Hillary weren't good candidates.
I mean, WTF!
I have reams of material to support what I wrote, and posting anything other than a tiny percentage of it would derail the thread further.
However, here are a couple of examples, and from Western sources. The first, excerpted below, is from a 38 page paper authored by Ivan Katchanovski, a Professor at the School of Political Studies and the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa, former Visiting Scholar at the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University, etc. he has written several books, including The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: The Mass Killing that Changed the World (pdf download link)
The paper, written in 2022, is entitled The Russia-Ukraine War and the Maidan in Ukraine
This is from the conclusion (bold emphasis mine). The full article is linked below the excerpt (click on the pdf link to access).
Katchanovski article
The second is from a February 2023 article by Jeffrey Sachs, a Professor at Columbia University, and prior to that for twenty years at Harvard University. The article is entitled The ninth anniversary of the Ukraine war
Again, the full article is linked below the excerpt (bold emphasis mine).
Sachs article
For those who prefer to watch and listen, rather than read, here is a relatively short (~30 minutes) video of Sachs speaking at Cambridge University in England, on "Understanding the Ukraine conflict". It is a very good primer, and the facts that serve as the foundation for his claims can be confirmed through many different sources.
Personally I like AI, but you have to be super accurate with your prompts.
90% of everything your read or hear is crap [*], "social media" on the internet takes that to 99.8% utter crap.
I knew it was going to be Katchanovski.
He speaks like he's some kind of ballistic expert with zero background or training. Actual scientific analysis don't line up with his claims.
Littered throughout the 1,000,000 word document are passages demonstrating conclusively that the sniper fire emanated from buildings controlled by the opposition to Yanukovych. Collectively, these excerpts strongly suggest the Maidan massacre was a false flag carried out by nationalist elements who aimed to ensure the president’s ouster.
The evidence “was quite sufficient to conclude categorically that on the morning of February 20, 2014, persons with weapons, from which the shots were fired, were in the premises of the Hotel Ukraina,” the court found.
Another section reveals “Hotel Ukraina” was “territory… not controlled by law enforcement agencies at that time.” Numerous video recordings show that before, during, and after the massacre, the building was overrun by the far-right opposition party Svoboda, whose leaders used the premises to coordinate their anti-Yanukovych activities on the streets below.
"Forensic examinations of the bullet holes by the government experts for the Maidan massacre trial suggested that Berkut policemen were shooting in the Hotel Ukraina snipers above the Maidan protesters and in trees and poles.
As for Sachs i think this real humdinger says it all
Being super accurate with a prompt may not be good enough i think....
There was a notorious fella of these upside-down parts who was attributed with saying
"Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."
I think we need to update that for AI research.
(not aimed at anyone here who has used it to try and educate themselves.)
I can't quite get it yet.
.... get in the way of 10 seconds of solid research?
The other one is
Give an infinite number of humans an infinite number of AI devices and...
All knowledge is lost
You've all drowned in crap in 10 seconds
You find out what Don McLean's American Pie was really about
It's still a work in progress.
Edit:
It would be nice (understatement!) if the answer was "we all come together in peace, love, harmony, understanding and agreement" but my money is not on that outcome.