Originally about tariffs and watches ... now just political rambling

Locked
Posts
795
Likes
2,124
That being the case, why does it not make sense to continue to export what we are exceptional at and import the things that we cannot make that cheaply?
Completely sensible, however in terms of $$$ - we appear to be exceptional at less things than china can make cheaply.
 
Posts
2,779
Likes
14,819
Then, I think you would probably agree that is really hard to combat and still pay American workers a fair living wage. And I think we both agree, generally, that people in America deserve to live within reasonable means.

That being the case, why does it not make sense to continue to export what we are exceptional at and import the things that we cannot make that cheaply?
America deserves to live within reasonable means?

Damn, if I said that some OF'ers would be howling xenophobia since it implies the Chinese(or India, Pakistan, Viet Nam etc. etc.) do not deserve to live within reasonable means.

Erich, sorry to say, but you will get some nasty PM's from some of these guys.
 
Posts
3,666
Likes
7,787
America deserves to live within reasonable means?

Damn, if I said that some OF'ers would be howling xenophobia since it implies the Chinese(or India, Pakistan, Viet Nam etc. etc.) do not deserve to live within reasonable means.

Erich, sorry to say, but you will get some nasty PM's from some of these guys.

I won't, and I haven't/ don't expect I will. Even when I have deeply disagreed with members openly, I have never received a nasty pm from anyone on this forum. Not once.

the statement wasn't exclusive, even if the subject group was inclusive. There was no implication, however- I did mention earlier how important it is to be aware that our choices have consequences elsewhere in the world.
Edited:
 
Posts
12,967
Likes
22,493
[/QUOTE]
That being the case, why does it not make sense to continue to export what we are exceptional at and import the things that we cannot make that cheaply?

Come on now, there’s no need to bring reasoned arguments into this.
 
Posts
901
Likes
4,169

Come on now, there’s no need to bring reasoned arguments into this.
[/QUOTE]

In today's world, aren't reasoned arguments now fake news?
 
Posts
822
Likes
1,399
I fully agree that these tariffs are driving trade deals - the question is how many of those trade deals will involve the US. There's a risk premium in US assets that wasn't there previously...where will that premium end up and what impact will it have with the ability of the US to make deals. The US has already broken trade deals, so why would we think any new deals will hold?
At this point, is a deal with the US really worth the paper it is written on? We've already seen someone whine about NAFTA and then sign the "best agreement we've ever made" in USMCA. Then he declares "Who would ever sign a thing like this?" All it takes is a temper tantrum for someone to renege on a deal so why would anyone sign a trade deal with the US right now?

As an American, it is sad to see us lose our credibility.
 
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,862
This is BY FAR, the least interesting thread I’ve ever seen on OF.
It’s disappointing, I thought this was a watch forum, not a Fox News/MSNBC comment section….

Is there a way to block this thread from showing in my feed?
It’s called the don’t look button. Currently attached to your finger…😉
 
Posts
468
Likes
1,174
This is BY FAR, the least interesting thread I’ve ever seen on OF.
It’s disappointing, I thought this was a watch forum, not a Fox News/MSNBC comment section….

Is there a way to block this thread from showing in my feed?
This is the opposite experience I've had: I find this thread fascinating, even with the occasional swerves it takes into more dogmatic bluster.

Personally, it's forced me to think a fair amount less about trade policy and more generally about industrial policy, and I've ended up thinking of it through the lens of watches because of this thread. Take Switzerland. They have done a phenomenal job of protecting watches as an industry, establishing rules which allow Swiss companies to be successful (the Rube-Goldberg-esque requirements of "swiss made" being a great example, or the fact that movement makers [Sellita, in my experience] will only sell COSC-certified movements to Swiss companies). Extrapolating from there, we can say: sure, Switzerland values its capacity as a global center for watches, and has done an excellent job prioritizing that.

Regardless of what/how anyone thinks about the current admin and the tariffs the president has enacted/paused/etc, as an American, what has been made clear is how little consensus there seems to be about what America is in terms of its manufacturing. The tariffs strike me as fairly arbitrary, and reliant on questionable math, but more than that, they're universal (in bad ways) and almost clumsy. ALL American products are protected. Which: fine, people can have whatever opinions they want. But it is striking, and that central q—what America is, what we're known for making, what we want to be known for making—is (at least for me) really fascinating and worth considering more deeply. If folks want tariffs, great. But wouldn't tariffs be more successful if implemented in ways that protect prioritized American industries? If so, what are those industries/exports?
 
Posts
1,776
Likes
7,029
It’s called the don’t look button. Currently attached to your finger…😉
Or just unfollow it.
 
Posts
650
Likes
2,127
It’s called the don’t look button. Currently attached to your finger…😉
Haha, thank you. Will do.

Edit: deleted my pointless post. Sorry.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,666
Likes
7,787
In the interest of getting this thread back on topic (lol), Trump has stated that tariffs on Chinese goods will come down substantially. My very serious questions are what deal or promises were secured from China that he made this statement; or, what jobs are we creating that backing off the tariffs now makes sense?
 
Posts
3,666
Likes
7,787
Haha, thank you. Will do.

Edit: deleted my pointless post. Sorry.

A pointless post in a borderline off topic thread? haha. I didn't see your post as pointless at all. This thread absolutely does not fit the mold most of us are used to on OF so I think your mixed reaction was completely reasonable.
 
Posts
696
Likes
2,382
In the interest of getting this thread back on topic (lol), Trump has stated that tariffs on Chinese goods will come down substantially. My very serious questions are what deal or promises were secured from China that he made this statement; or, what jobs are we creating that backing off the tariffs now makes sense?
Nothing was secured from China. China has stated that they will not negotiate under threat or duress. What's changed is the market is reacting negatively and there is real concern about a recession. For the same reason, the orange-man has said he will not fire Powell.
 
Posts
3,666
Likes
7,787
and reliant on questionable math,

I think it's fairly important that we universally recognize that the math itself is not questionable; it's the statement of what the math is all about that is outright false.

May seem like a distinction without merit? It's not.
 
Posts
29,246
Likes
75,644
Nothing was secured from China. China has stated that they will not negotiate under threat or duress. What's changed is the market is reacting negatively and there is real concern about a recession. For the same reason, the orange-man has said he will not fire Powell.
In addition - bonds. They don't need to sell what they hold now to hurt the US - all China has to do is not show up for the sales coming up, and it will hit the US hard. Hopefully someone in the current administration understands this.
 
Posts
2,588
Likes
2,872
In the interest of getting this thread back on topic (lol), Trump has stated that tariffs on Chinese goods will come down substantially. My very serious questions are what deal or promises were secured from China that he made this statement; or, what jobs are we creating that backing off the tariffs now makes sense?
Trump announced 500% tariffs or something like that. If he just says 40% tariffs instead of whatever previous amount he announced, he can say tariffs are reduced.
 
Posts
3,666
Likes
7,787
Trump announced 500% tariffs or something like that. If he just says 40% tariffs instead of whatever previous amount he announced, he can say tariffs are reduced.
Nothing was secured from China. China has stated that they will not negotiate under threat or duress. What's changed is the market is reacting negatively and there is real concern about a recession. For the same reason, the orange-man has said he will not fire Powell.

Ignoring the bit about Powell for a second since he can't do that (and makes the fear surrounding that topic complicated)
Help me understand the strategy here. Trump said (quoted in context):

"I'm not going to say 'oh, I'm going to play hardball with China...' no, no. We're going to be very nice... but ultimately they have to make a deal..."

How does this help bring jobs back into America? How does this force China to "make a deal?"

I guess give it more time?
 
Posts
13,131
Likes
18,033
How does this help bring jobs back into America?
It doesn't, of course. But that was never the object of the tariffs in the first place. The fact is that manufacturing for critical components of items needed for national security should have been protected from the beginning. However, a money-grubbing Congress encouraged producers to offshore production to secure campaign contributions for their next election, without spending on training for the workers displaced.

It took us 80 years to get here. It's not going to get fixed in four.
How does this force China to "make a deal?
That was likely the original intent. The tariffs on other countries was more to try to encourage them to made deals on other matters like immigration, increased military spending and border control.

What Trump didn't count on was the negative reactions by American companies to having their entire pricing models upended and China diversifying their currency holdings by selling US dollar denominated bonds. Why this wasn't anticipated is beyond my comprehension. I certainly do not need a Harvard MBA to see this coming.

A horrible miscalculation and further evidence of this administration's incompetence in macroeconomic matters.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
61
Likes
27
At this point, is a deal with the US really worth the paper it is written on? We've already seen someone whine about NAFTA and then sign the "best agreement we've ever made" in USMCA. Then he declares "Who would ever sign a thing like this?" All it takes is a temper tantrum for someone to renege on a deal so why would anyone sign a trade deal with the US right now?

As an American, it is sad to see us lose our credibility.

This is the scariest thing imo. This is a luxury watch forum, most ppl here will be able to weather through tough times. Having America turn into a place where long term deals can't be trusted makes the future economic outlook pretty damn bleak. I can't imagine pouring any reasonable amount of money into a venture when there's such a a high risk that so many cost variables can change in the blink of an election. I don't see how this doesn't kill any startups for the foreseeable future.