Forums Latest Members

Original box for a 1980 145.022 Speedmaster

  1. paddymoran Mar 31, 2021

    Posts
    616
    Likes
    1,310
    Hi, any knowledge on which of the two boxes pictured below (red or grey) would have been original to a 1980 145.022 Speedmaster? Maybe a different box altogether!! Thanks in advance - really appreciate all your help in this regard.
     
    704348A1-09FB-4E05-8605-1890E83BF0BF.jpeg 9F1AE500-67C5-4513-9B28-E4B4A2D04A9F.jpeg F07EFA8D-D71F-4FAD-8D47-05900F314905.jpeg AF6E0F50-7C5C-4ACC-AA2B-FEDE7FAD41AB.jpeg F7592491-6708-4925-890D-FC55BAE814FC.jpeg
  2. kov Trüffelschwein. Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    The grey box would rather be for the early-to-mid-nineties. Red one could work but it's older than that. Could work because Dealers were often putting watches in boxes they had on stock, especially the regular models and 145.022 is a regular Moonwatch.
     
  3. paddymoran Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    616
    Likes
    1,310
    Thanks for reconfirming what I thought about the grey box. I have a 145022 - 78 and a 145022 ST from 1980. Would be great to know the appropriate boxes for both watches. Thanks again, Paddy
     
  4. KstateSkier Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    838
    Likes
    3,260
    If its helpful this is the original box for my 1978 44B4F5B0-FDD6-4663-AD11-106EE779687E.jpg
     
    befobe, paddymoran and guwipa like this.
  5. paddymoran Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    616
    Likes
    1,310
    Thanks, I happen to have two NOS Omegas with very similar watch boxes. Would be grateful if you could confirm if the outside of your box and your outer box match the below pictures (obviously yours won’t have Quartz on it
     
  6. paddymoran Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    616
    Likes
    1,310
    E1001C45-344C-4D4D-AC30-199E51A176B4.jpeg
  7. Rado63 Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    328
    Likes
    242
    paddymoran likes this.
  8. paddymoran Apr 1, 2021

    Posts
    616
    Likes
    1,310
    Hi, it’s pretty definitive so that this is the correct box given your link and the above response. Thank you, Paddy