Forums Latest Members
  1. Superdoc Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    968
    Likes
    3,588
    Need some input...

    Here's the trade offer on the table...

    I'm really torn... Which probably says enough...

    These 2 Rolex
    image.jpg
    Non ceramic but one of the few engraved 16618
    image.jpg
    Twotone Everose DJ 37mm

    For this....
    image.jpg image.jpg

    Cash neutral...

    Would love some advice...
    Couldn't post on the Rolex forums...
     
    ikeo1 and lillatroll like this.
  2. Drawarms Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    That rolex sub is at around 15k call it
    the other one is at 8-10k call it

    that omega was 34k retail, but used can fetch high 20's maybe?

    Up to you, it might be a pretty equal trade but a tough decision for letting go 2 nice rolexs for 1 really nice omega
     
  3. DLT222 Double D @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    5,175
    Likes
    4,555
    One for sale for $20k and has been for ages
     
  4. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    8,736
    Likes
    69,169
    If you really want to make the trade, I would want some cash in that deal. IMO, the Omega has some more downside going forward while the Rolex values should hold well.

    From an personal preference point of view, I'd keep the Sub.:)
     
    Drawarms likes this.
  5. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    It's not *all* about the money, is it?

    If not, well, that seamaster is killer and looks very nice on the wrist. The cutout markers, the sedna gold. I think it smokes the other two.

    Take with a pinch of salt as I've never really clicked with Rolex though..
     
  6. Shem Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    480
    Likes
    439
    I like the Omega better than either of those Rolexes, but I agree with others that cash on top of the Omega is necessary for the trade to be remotely considerable.
     
    Nobel Prize likes this.
  7. AAAKK First listing in the ΩF B2B phone book Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    866
    Likes
    2,867
    Fan of both brands. Wouldn't make the trade, the Sub is a keeper for me.
     
    tinger likes this.
  8. Drawarms Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    THIS! Those Rolexs will hold more value down the line, but at the end of the day, if its not about the money- do what you need to do but you should get like 5k out of the deal or just do the sub for it straight up.
     
    Nobel Prize likes this.
  9. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    26,992
    Likes
    32,708
    There's an SM300 in Sedna Rose Gold for 20k starting bid on eBay atm:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seama...620?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_2&hash=item2a4f509564Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    Would I rather the SM300 over the other two?

    Easily yes, its a far nicer watch to wear than the sub in particular and that model of 18K sub I honestly don't think is anywhere near as special, while a vintage 1680/8 or something would be a different story. As a modern dive watch its just a rung below the SM300 in a lot of aspects, and with Rolex releasing the new 32xx series movement this year for the Day-Date it'll be a matter of a couple of years before we see both those Rolex models being pushed down in price to some degree with their older 3135s and the already superseded bracelet clasp and bezel on the sub, I honestly think both those models are already at their peak value and will be worth less as time goes on.

    Having said that they're combined worth more than the 20k that that SM300 is listed on eBay for, maybe some cash your way to even it out or go sub + some cash and sell the Datejust separately if he doesn't have cash to send your way.

    That SM300 in gold is just stunning, you'll genuinely enjoy wearing it.

    Not trying to put either watch down if they mean a lot to you, its just that compared to most of your other watches they're not that special for the money that's tied up with them, your 116505 I absolutely love but its a totally different level of watch with its movement bracelet and finishing compared to the 16618.
     
    Drawarms likes this.
  10. anselmw Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    224
    Likes
    134
    I agree, two of these seem worth more than the sedna sm300. I would ask for cash on top.
     
    Nobel Prize likes this.
  11. redpcar Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    3,699
    Likes
    7,909
    Sorry. I'm in the Rolex camp on this one, too. Fast forward 5 years, the difference will be even greater leaning toward the Rolex brand.
     
    Nobel Prize likes this.
  12. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    But Omega is moving to all in-house movements too... ::stirthepot::
    (kidding, kidding back on topic)
     
  13. randomguy Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    642
    Likes
    192
    Have to side with Rolex as my first choice, but I do luv all Omegas, and their fabulous time keeping.

    Would try for some cash back for the 2 rollies in the deal.

    Good luck.

    J
     
    Edited Apr 21, 2015
  14. tegee26 Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    28
    Being in the Rolex camp too. I am a sucker for Subs and the DJ is simply beautiful. It's a tough call, I just love both Rolexes, quite frankly, I am not a big fan of the SM300. I love Omega and love what they are doing with their in-house movement. But I just feel there is more long term value in the two Rolexes vs. the SM300 IMHO.
     
    Nobel Prize likes this.
  15. OmegaRookie Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    819
    Likes
    3,437
    SM300 in gold is awesome. I don't know my values well enough but do what you can to get that watch. It's beautiful
     
    fastPanda likes this.
  16. Nobel Prize Spell Master! Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    6,832
    Likes
    13,410
    I'll keep the Rolex. 2 great watches, specially the date-just which is simply perfect. The seamster is great, but it is 1 great watch for 2 get watches...and the Seamster will loose value far faster than the rollies
     
  17. Nobel Prize Spell Master! Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    6,832
    Likes
    13,410
    Just try this...forget the gold for a second...although on gold by weight you still loose on the trade, but forgetting that, a top of the line sub and a Datejust for an smp300...makes no sense. if you don't like the rolex anymore sell them and then buy the SMP and you'll still come on top versus this trade.
     
    Edited Apr 22, 2015
  18. jcmartinez98 Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    711
    Likes
    944
    plus, didn't you very recently obtain a PO with very similar look to that SM300? agree with above: if you're done with the rolexes, then sell them, and you can get the SMP with cash to spare.
     
    nima0071 likes this.
  19. nima0071 Apr 22, 2015

    Posts
    637
    Likes
    1,554
    I would keep the sub, Maybe let go the Datejust plus cash for the SM300, but sub is a sub.
     
  20. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Apr 22, 2015

    Posts
    16,353
    Likes
    44,932

    +1
     
    nima0071 likes this.