Opinions about this beautiful Constellation 2852 pie pan

Posts
37
Likes
9
Hello, Omega lovers. I'm just into Omega vintage, and considering getting one. I've found this Constellation pie pan 2852 in two tone, which to my little experience, I think it's in very good condition.

The seller has high reputation, says all parts are original, and ask for $1,900. With many advices to buy from trusted sellers, I almost pull the trigger. Until I spot somethings in other watches of the seller, which makes me believe the seller, even with their honest intention, may not know about Omega vintage well enough. I see an Omega Seamaster 168.002 & 166.028 that has "Chronometer" on the dial using 565 calibre, which from my research isn't chronometer calibre. Plus, I see a non-pie pan 168.004 has non-dauphine hands and non-hidden crown, which I believe every 168.004 pie pan or not has dauphine hands and hidden crown. I may be wrong, but they make me more cautious about this 2852 pie pan.

With the cases stated above, I try to look at the 2852 more closely but I still can't decide if the watch is truly original. I'm doubt the hands that have color differ from hour index, and a bit strange about the crown. However, I'm not sure if it's because of my overthinking. So I need help from more experience people in this community to share thoughts about which parts are replaced and if the price is justified. Again, the seller has high reputation and most of their watches are in very good condition. I'm just not sure if they know about Omega vintage well enough.

Thank you for any comments/thoughts. Feel free to correct me if I misunderstand something. I'm new and just want to learn more.

 
Posts
1,921
Likes
3,897
Dial looks original with nice arrowhead indices, some blister/spotting common with these, HM hands appear rose gold? Which suggest replacements. Crown replacement with later Omega logo. Movement correct. Some polishing not too bad imo. Price quite high
 
Posts
37
Likes
9
Dial looks original with nice arrowhead indices, some blister/spotting common with these, HM hands appear rose gold? Which suggest replacements. Crown replacement with later Omega logo. Movement correct. Some polishing not too bad imo. Price quite high
Thank you for your comment
 
Posts
21,028
Likes
48,050
Price is at least 2x what it's worth given the poor condition of the dial, IMO.
 
Posts
6,604
Likes
11,339
Price is at least 2x what it's worth given the poor condition of the dial, IMO.
True this. When the watch like this is two tone the importance of having a nice, clean original dial is IMO more important than if the watch was in stainless steel or solid gold. These versions are already less desirable to begin with and are harder to find with the case in nice shape.
 
Posts
1,921
Likes
3,897
The seller has high reputation, says all parts are original, and ask for $1,900. With many advices to buy from trusted sellers, I almost pull the trigger. Until
Good for you to ask first. It is very difficult to decide who is a “trusted seller” on the internet. As you point out both the honesty and the knowledge of the seller are unknown. Positive ratings are helpful but can be artificially inflated. The point is you need to have confidence in your own knowledge and assessment, and even then you are still at risk with unknown sellers.
For a new collector it is safer to buy from sellers in the Private Sales thread here on OF who are fellow collectors known on OF who care about their reputation.
 
Posts
37
Likes
9
True this. When the watch like this is two tone the importance of having a nice, clean original dial is IMO more important than if the watch was in stainless steel or solid gold. These versions are already less desirable to begin with and are harder to find with the case in nice shape.
Oh, I see. So, the dial condition comes before the original parts. Like, it’s better to have good condition dial with wrong hands or crown than poor dial condition with original hands and crown.
 
Posts
37
Likes
9
Good for you to ask first. It is very difficult to decide who is a “trusted seller” on the internet. As you point out both the honesty and the knowledge of the seller are unknown. Positive ratings are helpful but can be artificially inflated. The point is you need to have confidence in your own knowledge and assessment, and even then you are still at risk with unknown sellers.
For a new collector it is safer to buy from sellers in the Private Sales thread here on OF who are fellow collectors known on OF who care about their reputation.
I’ll check that thread. Thank you for your suggestion.
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
4,577
Oh, I see. So, the dial condition comes before the original parts. Like, it’s better to have good condition dial with wrong hands or crown than poor dial condition with original hands and crown.
yes & no: ist depends on, if it s a field/diver/utility..-watch or a dress-watch.
 
Posts
579
Likes
638
Oh, I see. So, the dial condition comes before the original parts. Like, it’s better to have good condition dial with wrong hands or crown than poor dial condition with original hands and crown.

Yes, generally that’s correct for these type of references.

Originality doesn’t always mean that all parts were sold with the watch 70 years ago. Crowns, crystals etc. were/are often parts that get changed. And that’s not an issue. Original parts can still be found, at some expense, and fitted so that it looks similar to when it left the factory. The same applies to hands, which can also be sourced. So you can somehow fix minor originality issues in a way that is totally legit.

But dial and case are more complex and because they widely play into the appeal of a watch, it’s important to get them right.

A damaged dial cannot be restored to look clean, a polished case cannot get its chamfers back. These are the most important parts to get original AND in the highest condition possible.

Otherwise you start going down the route of trying to find the same reference to find a donor dial or case and you end up buying the watch 2-3 times.

Having said that, this is a forum where people are collecting watches, so there is also a balance to find. Not every watch has to be perfect, but if it’s not, you want it to at least be fairly priced.
 
Posts
579
Likes
638
This is not the same watch, it also has condition issues but the price is more than half. And it’s sold by an established member.
 
Posts
37
Likes
9
Yes, generally that’s correct for these type of references.

Originality doesn’t always mean that all parts were sold with the watch 70 years ago. Crowns, crystals etc. were/are often parts that get changed. And that’s not an issue. Original parts can still be found, at some expense, and fitted so that it looks similar to when it left the factory. The same applies to hands, which can also be sourced. So you can somehow fix minor originality issues in a way that is totally legit.

But dial and case are more complex and because they widely play into the appeal of a watch, it’s important to get them right.

A damaged dial cannot be restored to look clean, a polished case cannot get its chamfers back. These are the most important parts to get original AND in the highest condition possible.

Otherwise you start going down the route of trying to find the same reference to find a donor dial or case and you end up buying the watch 2-3 times.

Having said that, this is a forum where people are collecting watches, so there is also a balance to find. Not every watch has to be perfect, but if it’s not, you want it to at least be fairly priced.

Thank you very much for your kind explanation.
 
Posts
37
Likes
9
This is not the same watch, it also has condition issues but the price is more than half. And it’s sold by an established member.

Thank you. The text below Omega logo looks strange but I don't know if it's because of damage. How do you think of the dial condition overall?
 
Posts
6,604
Likes
11,339
Like many here a gold cap connie is my least favorite case to get. I do have a few that I make exceptions for and as an example this is one I got because the dial was both uncommon and in nice original shape.

 
Posts
7,694
Likes
26,671
and in nice original shape

😂 If you're a buyer, it's "nice". A seller? Spectacular, Mint, Pristine...
 
Posts
37
Likes
9
Like many here a gold cap connie is my least favorite case to get. I do have a few that I make exceptions for and as an example this is one I got because the dial was both uncommon and in nice original shape.

That's a surprise to me. I've thought the SS is the least favorite. Why do people prefer gold cap the least?
 
Posts
5,573
Likes
8,633
That's a surprise to me. I've thought the SS is the least favorite. Why do people prefer gold cap the least?

It has a lot to do with modern tastes.
SS is the most popular as some find any gold watch too bling.

But also having a gold cap watch seems like a bit like chicanery.
“I’d like a gold watch but can’t afford it”
So the real thing is more desirable.

I personally have no issue with gold cap watches but desirability drives market forces and they say that gold cap watches command lower prices than SS.
(gold filled and gold plated even less of course)
 
Posts
1,164
Likes
3,430
I don't mind capped watches if the rest is special enough. Here's my two examples (both rose gold):

 
Posts
2,312
Likes
6,630
That's a surprise to me. I've thought the SS is the least favorite. Why do people prefer gold cap the least?
Also, I find gold capped cases to have softer edges than solid gold or SS.
 
Posts
5,573
Likes
8,633
Also, I find gold capped cases to have softer edges than solid gold or SS.
True but they can still look pretty damned sharp.