Forums Latest Members
  1. apm1 Jul 5, 2017

    Posts
    197
    Likes
    354
    Good evening,

    what do you guys think about this dial? The case ref. is 22209.

    Thanks
     
    IMG_3248.jpg IMG_3247.jpg IMG_3249.jpg
  2. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Jul 5, 2017

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    Redial, without a doubt
     
    x3no, HeuerLoon, gop76 and 1 other person like this.
  3. waXology Jul 5, 2017

    Posts
    220
    Likes
    289
    redial. looks like they used the wrong sized plates for the subdials. 3's look wrong too. mismatched 4's too. pointed and flat topped.
     
  4. Rasputin The Mad Monk of OF Jul 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,302
    Likes
    1,615
    Redial
     
  5. sjg22 Jul 5, 2017

    Posts
    879
    Likes
    2,880
    Redial - poorly applied lume as well
     
  6. MaiLollo Jul 6, 2017

    Posts
    1,560
    Likes
    4,331
    It may have been done on purpose, for it to look "old", which wouldn't be a nice thing to do.
    Or maybe it was just redialed a long time ago...
     
  7. apm1 Jul 6, 2017

    Posts
    197
    Likes
    354
    My initial assesment was: an original dial with re-applied lume on the numbers.
    I was wrong then...
     
  8. bgrisso Jul 6, 2017

    Posts
    3,128
    Likes
    6,887
    Not to kick the poor watch when it's down, but......obvious redial
     
  9. apm1 Jul 7, 2017

    Posts
    197
    Likes
    354
    Many thanks all for your prompt anwers!
     
    marco likes this.