Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I change the title now, I just come back from home with the watch , will post tommorow clean pictures but as Zilla says is all Omega and the split function works perfectly , this would be my last project of 2018 , I have to find a dial 3511.80 and the hands of the speedmaster split , this will depends if the date wheel is implemented on this movement.
I change the title now, I just come back from home with the watch , will post tommorow clean pictures but as Zilla says is all Omega and the split function works perfectly , this would be my last project of 2018 , I have to find a dial 3511.80 and the hands of the speedmaster split , this will depends if the date wheel is implemented on this movement.
Well I agree but my plan is to use it , I need to read the time on it 😀)) no hour not minute hand , but of course keeping the white dial and the hands on the side and hoping the « serial » will lead to a prototype model on the extract of archive and pictures before will confirm the packages.
Looks like this one will be a good one
Am I the only one super confused after reading this thread? 😕
Have fun and wear it in good health 👍
Am I the only one super confused after reading this thread? 😕
For clarity:
One member asked about a watch.
Another member made a statement about said watch, and hinted that they knew more, or had a good source for that statement.
When asked for more info they started being silly.
Several of us thought that was unhelpful.
The first member bought the watch.
I was definitely not silly
And as the member is happy with it, i count it as helpful 🍿
I was being polite.
For clarity, I thought you were being obnoxious.
Which is probably why a few members have blocked you on Instagram.
I couldn’t care less if William blocks me or not
Why can’t you answer a simple question? You made a statement with no back up. You can’t even answer how you know about this piece. Why is that so hard?
I’d never seen this piece and offered more useful information about it then you did, in fact I corrected part of your statement which was clearly wrong.
A friend of mine got it offered too so we had a long talk about
Your being obtuse... you know exactly what we are asking.
What was the verification that it was a prototype? How was that information passed on? With what provenance? You know the stuff that matters.
@Foo2rama
As i said ,the watch itself is absolutely uninteresting for me. That’s why i didn’t care to go on deep research and as i trust my buddy who got it offered 100% i didn‘ t need to ask more
Just to make it clear, for my personal collection the watch is as interesting as a invicta.
Again it’s a split second complication prototype in a Speedmaster reduced case , fully functional and authenticity proved
@Foo2rama
As i said ,the watch itself is absolutely uninteresting for me. That’s why i didn’t care to go on deep research and as i trust my buddy who got it offered 100% i didn‘ t need to ask more
Just to make it clear, for my personal collection the watch is as interesting as a invicta.