Forums Latest Members

OMEGA Speedmaster '57 (two-counter version) - why does it not get much love? (photo heavy)

  1. Butik Mar 7, 2021

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    1,331
    Hi!

    I am huge OMEGA freak with Omega only collection (7 pieces now, 8 soon). Last weekend after search for a two-counter chronograph I eventually pulled the trigger for good old '57. Now after two first days together and trying to browse some more info about this watch I wonder why it is so unpopular. Is it the thickness? Price? Anything else?

    There are a few to chose from with different dials and hand sets, execution is fantastic (and much better than so popular Moonwatch), even for me - it took quite a while to finally spot this one and bring into my watchbox.

    Any other '57 two-counter owners here?
     
    IMG_2069.jpg IMG_2070.jpg IMG_2071.jpg IMG_2072.jpg IMG_2073.jpg IMG_2075.jpg IMG_2076.jpg IMG_2078.jpg IMG_2079.jpg IMG_2080.jpg IMG_2089.jpg IMG_2090.jpg IMG_2093.jpg IMG_2096.jpg IMG_2097.jpg IMG_2098.jpg
    Tekashi_145.022, bk_cat and jaguar11 like this.
  2. scapa Mar 7, 2021

    Posts
    1,375
    Likes
    2,085
    It's a fine watch. I owned one briefly, and while I loved the accuracy, build quality and looks, I didn't find it as comfortable as I'd hoped -- thickness, but also balance on my wrist, even when compared to a few dive watch monsters like my Doxa 1500 and 5000, which are heavy and thick but perhaps a bit better balanced.

    But it's a great piece for larger wrists, and that movement is a stunner. I'd be all over a version that came in at 41/14mm or so.
     
  3. nicolamilton Mar 7, 2021

    Posts
    589
    Likes
    959
    Because a third counter is missing, and too much thickness, as you pointed.
     
  4. Jonathan40 Mar 7, 2021

    Posts
    1,033
    Likes
    5,179
    I’m in, love mine. As said by others build quality and finish amazing. I’m not a massive fan of the bracelet and can see how it might not be able to get a perfect fit to help with top heavy balance but on a strap or NATO it’s lovely.
    Bonus with the dial layout is timed correctly you could use the 3 o’clock dial for a second time zone. CE5AD799-735B-4377-BFD9-E9F596E03B17.jpeg
     
  5. neill1975 Mar 10, 2021

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    67
    Stunning looking watch didn't sit right on my wrist when I tried it on.
     
  6. Marsimaxam Mar 10, 2021

    Posts
    1,422
    Likes
    2,861
    Personally I have never liked date windows on a chronograph... but, that's just me.
     
  7. cfracing Mar 10, 2021

    Posts
    192
    Likes
    184
    Very nice watch, but for me it comes down to two words, too big.
     
    Edited Mar 10, 2021
  8. Dsloan Mar 10, 2021

    Posts
    2,608
    Likes
    16,621
    I'm not in love with the model, but I must say that I really like the two subdial layout on the automatic speedmasters. I get that it defies heritage, but I think it's a much more intuitive design and it also makes for larger, more legible registers.

    In regard to the '57, my issue is the straight lugs. I think it adds to the perceived bulkiness of an already thick watch.
     
  9. ExpiredWatchdog Mar 11, 2021

    Posts
    548
    Likes
    645
    Yup.

    Speedy '57 Dial.jpg

    Speedy '57 Back.jpg

    Wrist fits it just fine. Beautiful watch.
     
    Dsloan and CPRwatch like this.
  10. wilderbeast Mar 11, 2021

    Posts
    896
    Likes
    4,308
    I tried one on in an OB and, whilst I did find it a little bulky, it really is a gorgeous watch in the metal and very stylish. Ultimately, it was too expensive for me and I ended up with a FOIS, which I do really love as my one modern Omega.
     
  11. ConElPueblo Mar 11, 2021

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    There are three counters, but only two subdials :)
     
    wilderbeast likes this.
  12. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Mar 11, 2021

    Posts
    8,728
    Likes
    69,016
    Nothing wrong with it, hope you enjoy yours! :thumbsup:

    Speedmaster fans around here seem to lean heavily to the classic configuration, even for modern references.
     
  13. NGO1 Mar 11, 2021

    Posts
    1,308
    Likes
    6,018
    Two words: George Clooney.
    Dude ruined movies, tequila and now Omega 57s.


     
  14. cvalue13 Mar 11, 2021

    Posts
    3,979
    Likes
    8,394
    upload_2021-3-11_11-49-13.gif
     
    red crowned and TDBK like this.
  15. Butik Apr 25, 2021

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    1,331
    The Fifty Seven on a custom made crocodile strap (actually this strap has been crafted for my Aqua Terra with olive dial, but I think it works well with this one too).
     
    IMG_2796.jpg IMG_2798.jpg IMG_2799.jpg
    Eve likes this.
  16. tmilnthorp Apr 26, 2021

    Posts
    89
    Likes
    175
    Absolutely an amazing watch. They have definitely slipper under the radar a bit.

    I own two: each commemorates the birth of one of my daughters. Needless to say, they are my favorites and are priceless to me.
     
  17. Speedy1 Apr 26, 2021

    Posts
    42
    Likes
    28
    i think it's beautiful and may still pull the trigger on a two-tone version at some point. my only reservation has been its thickness relative to the watch case diameter. Wish it was more like 13.5 or 14mm thick
     
  18. bgrisso Apr 28, 2021

    Posts
    3,125
    Likes
    6,882
    I think is way too big, especially the thickness, and not crazy on the date, but if you have big wrists, could see it working. Much prefer the 60th anniversary reissue myself.
     
  19. Mugul Apr 28, 2021

    Posts
    33
    Likes
    46
    I recently tried a 57’ on. I love this dial layout but the Lug to lug makes the watch feel very large on my 6.75” wrist. In a bracelet I believe it’s even slightly worse as the first links (against the case) are rigid and actually extend the effective lug to lug even further and there is no micro adjust (not 100% certain) like the other Speedies. Definately better for a large wrist IMO.
     
  20. Butik May 16, 2021

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    1,331
    It absolutely is for the large wrist - 41,5mm is theoretical diameter but it looks much bigger and wears bigger.

    For me this is a pure strap lover, not so good for bracelet, especially the OEM one. As you noticed the endlinks give the watch huge length, not suitable for most wrists. On the strap though it's good even on the smaller side of the wrist.