Forums Latest Members
  1. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    I am looking at this Omega Speedmaster 176.0012.

    What do yall think?

    Anything look wrong?


    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]




     
    Etp095 likes this.
  2. ICONO Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    1,589
    Likes
    5,635
    A good clear, sharp image,… taken close in & straight on…, in daylight,… without camera shake………would be enormously helpful

    Have you bought this already ?

    Are to intending to instantly ‘flip it’ ? …
     
    SCTexas likes this.
  3. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    Have not bought yet.

    Not going to flip.

    Best images I can get. Going to meet the guy next week.
     
  4. OmegaRolex Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    381
    Likes
    732
    It looks correct and amazing!
     
  5. Vicke Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    455
    Likes
    769

    It might be a watch ;)


    Pictures are to bad to tell anything but the abow.

    When you meet the seller, take your own pictures and post them back here if you are unsure.
     
    SCTexas likes this.
  6. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    Thanks for looking at the photos. I will post an update next week.

    I mainly wanted to know if the hands looked correct or if there was anything obviously wrong.
     
  7. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    I appreciate all comments and opinions as I'm not an expert.
     
  8. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    I am working on some.crown and caseback photos as well as a closeup ofnthe dial and hands

    It looks like the crystal is scratched, but the crystal goes over the bezel. I need to find some better photos to confirm that

    Close up[​IMG]
     
  9. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    This Speedmaster band is on the left [​IMG]

    The caseback
    [​IMG]
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  10. Lowflight Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    513
    Likes
    748
    Looks good depending on price. Needs crystal for sure. Hands look like they could be service, but tough to tell. I have been looking at 4.5s mysel as of late.
     
    SCTexas and lando like this.
  11. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    The clasp
    [​IMG]
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  12. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    What is fair?
     
  13. Lowflight Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    513
    Likes
    748
    PM sent. Dunno how much a crystal replacement is, but as long as it runs and keeps time, it is worth every dime. Lemme know if you decide not to buy. Ha Ha
     
  14. SCTexas Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    More photos.

    Conformed those are service hands. The originals come with the watch.[​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]
     
    WYO_Watch and Etp095 like this.
  15. bama2141 Dec 17, 2017

    Posts
    562
    Likes
    1,239
    Love this model. The chrono seconds and minutes on the central pinion makes reading very easy. A couple of things to watch out for...

    The crystal is mineral glass, not hesalite. Scratches will not polish out with polywatch. A replacement crystal isn’t too expensive though.

    Take a good look at the case near the lugs — if the case has been over polished the metal gets very thin in that area.

    Also look at the polished bevels on the sides of the case — they should look sharp and even from side to side. They’ll look wavy if a poor polishing was done.

    This style case can get pretty ratty looking if you’re careless with it. Dents, dings, and scratches in the sunburst finish can get very unattractive. A quality relapping can breathe life back into it though. It’s one of the few designs that refinishing trumps patina (at least in my opinion).

    Mine says hi:

    A9BF5075-45DF-46BD-91D3-62201C45FB5F.jpeg
     
    0-60 likes this.
  16. SCTexas Feb 15, 2018

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    Okay finally met the owner and picked it up.

    I'll post better photos tomorrow.

    Question is this a Mk 4.5 or Mk5?
     
    20180214_200753.jpg
    Etp095 likes this.
  17. SCTexas Feb 15, 2018

    Posts
    91
    Likes
    54
    Weird the book say Mk V on the cover, but hand written notes inside indicate a 4.5 and give the reference for a 4.5.

    I need to date this Ser. 508925 However. That isn't enough numbers.
     
    20180215_233928.jpg 20180215_233911.jpg
    Edited Feb 15, 2018
    Etp095 likes this.
  18. Andy K Dreaming about winning an OFfie one day. Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,819
    Likes
    5,885
    Yours is definitely a 4.5. That’s not an official name, collectors named it the 4.5 because it has the case of a Mark IV and the cal. 1045 of a Mark V. Many, if not all, cal. 1045s came with Mark V instruction manuals.
     
    SCTexas likes this.
  19. bama2141 Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    562
    Likes
    1,239
    Is it true that the only “official” Mark Vs are the ones in the German “Teutonic” cases?
     
    SCTexas likes this.
  20. Andy K Dreaming about winning an OFfie one day. Feb 16, 2018

    Posts
    1,819
    Likes
    5,885
    That's my understanding.
     
    Paedipod likes this.