Omega seamaster .Which model ?

Posts
1,011
Likes
419
Haven't seen any Omega looking like that before or after . Have seen the specific watch for sale though . But doesn't think he was able to sell it . I have given up tying to find the original reference for it . If it ever existed i don't now ?
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
I have a SEAMASTER1983 MARINER III ST 396.0986, with original Omega steel strap 1394/087 with 18k gold alternate links, and with Ω folding clasp. The gold applications are now badly tarnished., and will not clean up
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
Teading the thread above, my above watch was purchased in Darwin Australia in 1986.

I had “18k Gold applications” on alternate links and they are now severely tarnished - some parts almost blue, and spoils the look. ( I did not use it for over 15 years, as it was really a dress watch and not really water resistant despite Omega’s claim it was good to 30m). However , looking at the comments from Periwhuskey above ( who bought a similar one the same year, 1986, in Brisbane Australia, it may be mine is gilt and hence the tarnishing over the years.
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
Teading the thread above, my above watch was purchased in Darwin Australia in 1986.

I had “18k Gold applications” on alternate links and they are now severely tarnished - some parts almost blue, and spoils the look. ( I did not use it for over 15 years, as it was really a dress watch and not really water resistant despite Omega’s claim it was good to 30m). However , looking at the comments from Periwhuskey above ( who bought a similar one the same year, 1986, in Brisbane Australia, it may be mine is gilt and hence the tarnishing over the years.
 
Posts
18
Likes
1
I googled 196.0242 and this model came up http://www.chrono24.se/omega/seamaster-marine-mariner-iii-ref-1960242-kaliber-1420--id2987733.htm. This model i have found before . Look closely at the picture . On the watch the dial goes all the way out to the edge .Look at this two pictures . Spot the difference ? The first is a 196.0242/396.0938 and the other?
I recently came into possession of my late father’s watch which looks exactly like the piece in the first photo above. I’ve had a rather fruitless search trying to establish its reference, up until reading through these posts.....sort of!
I guess all will be revealed when the battery needs replacing. It has 1420 stamped on the case, and 1448/431.8 on the clasp.
 
Posts
16,739
Likes
47,338
I recently came into possession of my late father’s watch which looks exactly like the piece in the first photo above. I’ve had a rather fruitless search trying to establish its reference, up until reading through these posts.....sort of!
I guess all will be revealed when the battery needs replacing. It has 1420 stamped on the case, and 1448/431.8 on the clasp.

Welcome to the forum, Nice piece which will reveal all once inside caseback is seen. 1420 is the movement number IIRC
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
34,368
I recently came into possession of my late father’s watch which looks exactly like the piece in the first photo above. I’ve had a rather fruitless search trying to establish its reference, up until reading through these posts.....sort of!
I guess all will be revealed when the battery needs replacing. It has 1420 stamped on the case, and 1448/431.8 on the clasp.

I'd say it's an Omega 396.0938, Seamaster Mariner III, as @STANDY noted, 1420 is the caliber (movement). If the battery hasn't been changed for a while, or if the watch has stopped you should remove the battery ASAP as they can leak and cause damage.

I quite like my version 😉.

114434-2d34063c7678e951735e14f3d6f4a82c.jpg
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hello from Brisbane Australia,
I purchased the 'mystery' model in 1987 from a family owned chain of jewelry stores, specifically the one at Indooroopilly Shopping Town.
Last week I had the battery replaced, seals checked and a general clean.
Here is a photo of inside the back case and of the watch. Note the original band.
Hope this answers some questions.
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
I have an almost identical watch however the face is white with gilt edging and numerals. It originally had a band with alternate gilt/steel bars but this was replaced by an all steel one. I purchased it in Brisbane, Australia in 1986 (New) does that help with identification?
Hi periwhisky,
I too purchased the one you did and also in Brisbane around the same time (1987). I have a couple of photos on my post 02 Oct 2020.
Regards BrisRob
p.s. Whisky is another weakness of mine.
 
Posts
497
Likes
248
Hmm, a really rare watch. This is the first time I see such. Сan someone take a photo of the movement?
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hmm, a really rare watch. This is the first time I see such. Сan someone take a photo of the movement?
Hello Alek,
I have the matching photo of the movement.
Regards,
BrisRob.
 
Posts
9,638
Likes
15,198
Not a single bit of Omega re-branding there. It's clearly the correct ETA base movement but that is unusual, I would have expected something, 1430 stamped on there for instance, but maybe that is how they came.
 
Posts
497
Likes
248
Thank you very much for the photo

Not a single bit of Omega re-branding there. It's clearly the correct ETA base movement but that is unusual, I would have expected something, 1430 stamped on there for instance, but maybe that is how they came.

Totally agree with you. I will assume that the mechanism was changed in this particular watch.
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
It's not fake, it's a Seamaster Mariner 3 ref. 196.0242 / 396.0938 cal. 1420 (quartz), and pretty rare.

/F

I believe I may have this one? I am trying to find out as much about this watch as possible and this post seems to be the closest I’ve got. Any info would
Be greatly appreciated.