Omega Seamaster Geneve

Posts
16
Likes
1
Hi

Can someone help me to know the year and reference # of this watch.?
I was checking around and looks like 1969 ; due that 1967-1968 should say on front '' Seamaster'' bellow geneve.
The case and back are solid gold.
Pretty rare model.

 
Posts
21,073
Likes
48,118
One-piece case, no back.

1969 is plausible, but it could be a little earlier also. Not sure that it matters very much, the watch looks legit. For me, the only issue affecting value or desirability is what karat gold the case is.

Have it opened when you get the chance, the reference number will be inside the back of the case and the serial number will be on the movement, from that you can infer the year.
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
Thank you for your message. The case is 18 kt.
I do not have the correct tools to open it, but I will next week early and let you know the movement and serial number.

,
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
the shop where we bought many years ago in Spain told me that the year is 1969-1970, Seamaster Genève, very rare model
 
Posts
11,637
Likes
20,347
the shop where we bought many years ago in Spain told me that the year is 1969-1970, Seamaster Genève, very rare model

Why do you say it’s rare? The fact it’s 18ct?
 
Posts
21,073
Likes
48,118
I suspect that it is pretty uncommon to find a later Geneve like this in 18k gold. This model, with the utilitarian case style, was more typically an entry-level piece, IIRC.

I don't think that the particular combination of Geneve and Seamaster was so unusual. There was a lot of co-branding of the model lines in the 60s. You can find almost any combination if you spend enough time looking.
 
Posts
11,637
Likes
20,347
because in the dial say geneve and back say seamaster , yes it is 18 kt

To clear it up, a seamaster back with a Geneve dial is absolutely not rare. In fact it’s very common for this period. However, the 18ct case is quite uncommon for this case style.
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
I suspect that it is pretty uncommon to find a later Geneve like this in 18k gold. This model, with the utilitarian case style, was more typically an entry-level piece, IIRC.

I don't think that the particular combination of Geneve and Seamaster was so unusual. There was a lot of co-branding of the model lines in the 60s. You can find almost any combination if you spend enough time looking.
Yes, you right, is not uncommon in stain steel, I found it a lot, but not in gold.
Thank you !!!
 
Posts
1,940
Likes
3,922
The back sure looks like stainless to my eyes. Do you have better photo to show its gold?
 
Posts
21,073
Likes
48,118
The back sure looks like stainless to my eyes. Do you have better photo to show its gold?
It looks like gold to me, and I see what might be a stamp. We're just taking the OP's word for the fact that it's 18k.
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
The back sure looks like stainless to my eyes. Do you have better photo to show its gold?

The back sure looks like stainless to my eyes. Do you have better photo to show its gold?

 
Posts
25
Likes
11
It might be your photo is bad quality Not taken in daylight? The back locks very pale compared to the same whatch I added. Is yours the same as on this image. This is 18kt case back.

 
Posts
16
Likes
1
It might be your photo is bad quality Not taken in daylight? The back locks very pale compared to the same whatch I added. Is yours the same as on this image. This is 18kt case back.

Let see now .
Much better.
 
Posts
25
Likes
11
I see the logo is less detailed on yours. Also the inscribed "SEAMASTER" is very different.despit it is almost same age.

 
Posts
16
Likes
1
Hi ; I opened it; but no reference at the back.
Looks like the movement 552 and the sería 25605371 means that the watch was made in 1967

 
Posts
21,073
Likes
48,118
What are you showing us? Is this the same watch? That caseback can't be for a Seamaster, can it?