That's a very good argument!
I also wonder if it wouldn't make sense to have more diversity in my watch collection. I mean buying a different Omega model and not the Diver 300M.
I've always set myself the goal of having as many different watches as possible so that my collection doesn't get boring.
For example, I would also like to buy an Aqua Terra. Or a Speedmaster 57, which are watches that I don't yet have in my collection.
The only problem is that I simply like the Diver 300M much more.
😀
I'm afraid that in a few years' time I might regret having bought so many identical watch models like the Diver 300M instead of a completely different model, which I don't have yet.
I think most watch collectors try to buy as many different watch models as possible and not several different variations of one and the same model.
How do you see it?
From this point of view, I actually find it better to own many different Omega models. That would simply bring more variety when wearing them and it would certainly be nicer to look at if you had lots of completely different watches, even if you don't like wearing some of them.
On the other hand, it makes absolutely no financial sense to buy watches that you don't like so much just to have a varied collection. Especially when there's so much money involved and you're destroying a lot of money by buying each of these watches. If they were at least watches that were reasonably worthwhile, stable or increasing in value, then I could cope with buying watches that I don't like so much.