- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
Omega seamaster bumper 2577-4 Avis svp
- Posts
- 900
- Likes
- 1,651
Bruce235
·Redial, the cross hair is on top of the logo alignment is poor, print too thick. Lume is sloppy.
Crown is also incorrect.
Crown is also incorrect.
- Posts
- 1,178
- Likes
- 2,464
Nepomuceño
·Redial, the cross hair is on top of the logo alignment is poor, print too thick. Lume is sloppy.
Crown is also incorrect.
The OP should be more worried about the heavy wear on the lugs.
- Posts
- 3,426
- Likes
- 13,236
MtV
·I disagree about the redial. Crosshairs and print have fallen victim to heavy radium patina which has a shadowy effect to the markers and print. Lume is exactly what you would expect on a 2577 with radium. You’re right about the crown.
The OP should be more worried about the heavy wear on the lugs.
+1. Not a nice example.
- Posts
- 900
- Likes
- 1,651
Bruce235
·I disagree about the redial. Crosshairs and print have fallen victim to heavy radium patina which has a shadowy effect to the markers and print. Lume is exactly what you would expect on a 2577 with radium. You’re right about the crown.
The OP should be more worried about the heavy wear on the lugs.
- Posts
- 4,827
- Likes
- 12,218
- Posts
- 1,178
- Likes
- 2,464
Nepomuceño
·Really? I defer to your expertise, but the crosshair is printed on top of the Omega logo and are poorly aligned at 6 and 3. Would the factory ship that?
- Posts
- 2,877
- Likes
- 4,594
sheepdoll
·Having working with one of these (still missing a case.) There is something off on that dial that jumped out at me before the photo completly loaded.
Could be the so called radium patina. The lume on the OP looks really heavy. Perhaps if the case was tight, there was a lot of the radium gas trapped in the case.
I looked at my photo again so perhaps that is the way it was done. (ignore the hour hand.)
I also do not seem to have any cross hair dials. I wonder if cross hairs were a later thing?
Could be the so called radium patina. The lume on the OP looks really heavy. Perhaps if the case was tight, there was a lot of the radium gas trapped in the case.
I looked at my photo again so perhaps that is the way it was done. (ignore the hour hand.)
I also do not seem to have any cross hair dials. I wonder if cross hairs were a later thing?
- Posts
- 8,769
- Likes
- 72,722
Spruce
··Sunburst dial fanI have the same 1950 2577-4 model although mine has a marginally earlier serial number.
I’m not an expert on redials but, given the look of the dial, the cross hair, and the fact that it has ‘Seamaster' written on the dial, I share the suspicions expressed above.
I’m not an expert on redials but, given the look of the dial, the cross hair, and the fact that it has ‘Seamaster' written on the dial, I share the suspicions expressed above.
