Omega Seamaster 600 Technical dial, redial?

Posts
7
Likes
0
Hello all,
Have read all that I could find on this type of watch and am beginning to think this is a redial. Any help would be apprieciated. I think type face a bit thick, red line hitting the E in Omega not in line with upright of E and T/T nearly touching second markers. Haven't got pics of crown face.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Ben

 
Posts
6,498
Likes
10,176
Redial IMHO. Print too crude
 
Posts
17,938
Likes
37,514
The back has obviously been tarted up with bad brushing.
The dial, while nice (from a distance) looks a bit too heavily printed as @Mark020 noted.

A much better photo of the dial would be needed to convinve me one way or the other, but at the moment, it's a redial.
 
Posts
24,246
Likes
53,989
For comparison. I am noticing that the Omega symbol is very different, in additional to bolder printing overall.

 
Posts
7
Likes
0
For comparison. I am noticing that the Omega symbol is very different, in additional to bolder printing overall.

Thanks for taking the trouble to post pic. All is clear now. Lovely watch, I wish.
 
Posts
13,198
Likes
22,952
This reference with technic dial is seen with a range of dials including both ‘old’ and ‘new’ Omega logo, however, this one is a redial.
 
Posts
7
Likes
0
Swisswatchclassics, someone to avoid
Louis, owner of above mentioned has since made good the problem. I couldn't delete the previous text so am posting this one.