Omega Seamaster 300 165.024 FAKE ???

Posts
782
Likes
838
Why ? What was the tell ?

Take a couple minutes to research fake or aftermarket seamaster 300s. This one has almost everything wrong with it.
 
Posts
2,756
Likes
3,664
A little research would tell you the bezel is wrong and the case is wrong for starters.
 
Posts
6,702
Likes
10,486
Assume that most of ones offered atm are fake. And if it looks too good to be true you have a 99% chance it is
 
Posts
299
Likes
221
There is only one thing, which is correct to the 166.024 and it is the caliber 565 movement. Even serial number is out of the range.
Rest is a bad fake and never seen Bienne...

Why this is a second tread about the same fake watch form the same user?
 
Posts
8,704
Likes
61,763
Bot

Or, as I’ve suspected for many years, we are part of a Psy101 experiment at many universities.
 
Posts
24,723
Likes
54,916
Why ? What was the tell ?
I think that you are not ready to buy a 165.024 without a great deal of studying. Alternatively, you can buy one for a premium price from a trusted fellow collector.
 
Posts
337
Likes
279
Wow. Maybe “Or” will become the new term of art for a fake SM 300. As in, “I hate those artificially aged dials. And that bezel? Definitely Or.”
 
Posts
6,367
Likes
21,710
Mate....You have got lots and lots of answers...!

Bot

Or, as I’ve suspected for many years, we are part of a Psy101 experiment at many universities.


You should buy it. Pay whatever it takes. You seem to want it.
 
Posts
250
Likes
233
That tritium should NOT be glowing like that in 2025…