Omega Seamaster 145.016 Cal. 321: Original Hands?

Posts
25
Likes
3
Hello,

I own this stainless steel Seamaster. Somebody suggested the hands are not original?

Does anyone else own a similar example with the finer hour markers for comparison?

Thanks

Nicholas / UK

 
Posts
25
Likes
3
Reference I believe 145.016. There is a similar version with square onyx hour markers.
 
Posts
3,398
Likes
7,552
Looks more like 145.018 with that case. Have you opened it to see the inside caseback? Is it cal 861 or 321?
heres 1 I had for comparison. Hands on yours a little longer but not much
 
Posts
25
Likes
3
Reference I believe 145.016. There is a similar version with square onyx hour markers.
Looks more like 145.018 with that case. Have you opened it to see the inside caseback? Is it cal 861 or 321?
heres 1 I had for comparison. Hands on yours a little longer but not much

Hello, to respond to you question the movement is the 321.
 
Posts
25
Likes
3
Hello,

I own this stainless steel Seamaster. Somebody suggested the hands are not original?

Does anyone else own a similar example with the finer hour markers for comparison?

Thanks



Reference I believe 145.016. There is a similar version with square onyx hour markers.
 
Posts
25
Likes
3
Looks more like 145.018 with that case. Have you opened it to see the inside caseback? Is it cal 861 or 321?
heres 1 I had for comparison. Hands on yours a little longer but not much

 
Posts
25
Likes
3
I will take it to Omega. They should be able to tell me in what watch the movement originated.

 
Posts
3,398
Likes
7,552
The minute hand may be a bit long. Here is a comprehensive research thread the answer is likely there. Many good photos excellent examples.