Omega Ref. 2894

alexenache · Dec 6, 2025

Hey guys,

yesterday I bought this beautiful Omega in 18K Roségold from a watchmaker. It has the Cal. 267 and it’s from 1957. Unfortunately it has not the original crystal and crown. I think both should be signed with the logo on it. Am I right?

The biggest point is the dial. It has been restored by a professional for Omega Dials. What do you think about the dial and the fact that it has been redone?

Greets
Alex

skand · Dec 13, 2025

This is a so-called Omega Tresor from the 1950s. The watch is not a collector's item, but as a watch to wear, I think it's cool.

AG77 · Dec 24, 2025

You won't find a lot of love on a collector forum for any redial. But it looks nice and it's pretty well done, in my opinion. The rose gold case and furniture is a nice look and that's really what you're buying. I bet it looks super on your wrist. I agree with the above: while it may not be a collector item it does have appeal.

Dan S · Dec 24, 2025

At the very least, it has the value of the gold and a couple hundred more for the movement. Given the repainted dial, I certainly wouldn't worry about the crown.

skand · Dec 24, 2025

Generally speaking, these Tresors aren't particularly prized as collector's items. They were once a cheap gold watch with a push-in caseback, available in a few different models.

Omega Ref. 2894

alexenache

skand

AG77

Dan S

skand

Similar threads

Is this Omega ref 2391-3 authentic? could not find the same exact dial

Omega ref. 2846 18c, cal.501

NEW YEAR SALE! Vintage Omega ref. 2077-4 cal. 33.3 CHRO Steel Chronograph JUMBO 38mm

Omega ref.2846. Is this watch worth it?

Local marketplace listing for a 1952 Omega Ref 2635-4 - should I take the risk?

Omega 14ct 2894 price