Omega Pocket Watch

I’m new to the forum and really like what I see. I live in North Myrtle Beach SC and have been here since 2003 after moving here from Annapolis, MD. I collected and repaired clocks as a hobby for many years and was active in the local chapter of the NAWCC. About 35 years ago a friend of mine gave me the Omega pocket watch shown in the attached photos. It was given to him by his grandfather and he had nobody to pass it on to. It does have a stopwatch feature built in that just suddenly stopped working. It feels like something is simply hung up. At any rate I was interested in knowing more about this watch. My photography is not the best but hopefully good enough to give you a good idea of what I have.

Thank you for the invitation @Vitezi! Yes, I think I can offer a bit. I agree with JimInOz’s comments, very good.

This is a 19’’’CHRO, the first of Omega’s chronographs, originally dating from 1898 - and because of this dating, I’d expect the movement to be a 19’’’ CHRO HNB.

The case will be listed as ‘Acier’ - which is French for steel, but in those days not stainless steel: it would be mild steel and possibly with a gun metal finish. The case looks original (Omega) to me: we see the inner case-back/dustcover - I think the outer case-back will have the Omega mark on the inside.

I agree with Jim that the case number dates it at around 1904. The movement number will of course be under the dial.

The minute track on the dial is marked to 1/5th second - which is why it is marked up to 300. Of significance is that there are two sub-dials - continuous seconds at 6 o’clock and at 12 o’clock is a 30 minute counter. Later dials on the 19’’’CHRO were the ‘special A.T.’ dial with the ‘CADRAN BREVETE S.G.D.G.’ - which (typically) did not have a sub-dial at 6 o’clock and the sub-dial at 12 o’clock was a 15 minute counter.

Jim is correct in noting the ‘M’ on the movement (to which @Tire-comedon has previously referred), which was used on watches destined for France. ‘M’ was used if the movement was cased in metal, ‘A’ (for Argent) if the case was silver and ‘O’ (for Or) if the case was gold.

My own version in gun metal, quite similar to the OP’s, is below. This came from another distinguished OF member!
Lovely watches - and now over 120 years old!

Such a beautiful watch in the gun metal with the gold hands.
May I enquire as to how much such a beautiful piece would go for. I'll be having to keep an eye on the seller sites if it's not to expensive 😀

wonderful pieces and great advice from @OMTOM 👍

Jim, your ‘simple’ and interesting question touches on two separate subjects - each interesting and NOT simple. But I suggest not appropriate in this thread - they would be worthy of threads of their own.

A brief comment here though to say that I don’t think this is a negative set movement.

The movement reference (HNB) (if I am correct!) was a hangover from the early classifications at the beginning of the Omega operation. The same movement (both simple and CHRO versions) became a 19’’’LOB: the ‘L’ was ‘Lepine’ (and could therefore have been ‘S’ for savonette); the ‘O’ was Omega (because the operation included manufacture of ‘other types’, not only Omega); the ‘B’ was movement quality (and could have been A, C and right up to DDR).

The Omega operation (as it became) started in 1894 - but was of course a continuation of the long-established Louis Brandt operation. Some of these early references are not understood but here is an example of the transition of classification.

The above is my understanding - I may be wrong.
As for more on the negative set theme, maybe @Tire-comedon or @watchtinker or others could come in here, perhaps on a new thread?

As so often, David Boettcher’s excellent website offers something - here: http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/watchmovement.html

Thanks to everyone for your insight into my watch. A very great learning experience.

It has made a nice change to see the pictures of this lovely looking pocket watch.