- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 120
Omega in 9ct gold with Dennison case box e papers
- Posts
- 1,324
- Likes
- 1,865
Sherbie
·Looks nice
the hallmark inside the case back is from 1958 (birmingham, anchor, and a “J” or “flying T” type symbol
the buckle alone is worth 200 gb pounds or so - whats the hall mark on this? - the same as above?
is there another hallmark stamp on the 1 o’clock lug ? If so, please provide a close up photo
would also like to see more photos of the box - inside and out please
the hallmark inside the case back is from 1958 (birmingham, anchor, and a “J” or “flying T” type symbol
the buckle alone is worth 200 gb pounds or so - whats the hall mark on this? - the same as above?
is there another hallmark stamp on the 1 o’clock lug ? If so, please provide a close up photo
would also like to see more photos of the box - inside and out please
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 120
Artu58
·Looks nice
the hallmark inside the case back is from 1958 (birmingham, anchor, and a “J” or “flying T” type symbol
the buckle alone is worth 200 gb pounds or so - whats the hall mark on this? - the same as above?
is there another hallmark stamp on the 1 o’clock lug ? If so, please provide a close up photo
would also like to see more photos of the box - inside and out please
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 120
Artu58
·Looks nice
the hallmark inside the case back is from 1958 (birmingham, anchor, and a “J” or “flying T” type symbol
the buckle alone is worth 200 gb pounds or so - whats the hall mark on this? - the same as above?
is there another hallmark stamp on the 1 o’clock lug ? If so, please provide a close up photo
would also like to see more photos of the box - inside and out please
From the photos I currently have I was able to obtain these two enlargements of the buckle.
The mark on the handle at ure 1 is certainly an inscription but it cannot be deciphered.
It seems to me that the symbols on the caseback are the same as those on the buckle
I can't wait for it to arrive to be able to see it live
Edited:
- Posts
- 2,278
- Likes
- 19,725
- Posts
- 1,324
- Likes
- 1,865
Sherbie
·Hi Art
agree the OP’s second hand looks too long, but yours looks a little short to me ( but may be the photo you posted) - does the second hand reach the minute markers?
OP - agree, buckle also looks to be 1958
agree the OP’s second hand looks too long, but yours looks a little short to me ( but may be the photo you posted) - does the second hand reach the minute markers?
OP - agree, buckle also looks to be 1958
- Posts
- 9,503
- Likes
- 14,985
padders
··Oooo subtitles!Here is my now departed 13308 for further hand comparison. Be aware that Birmingham assay office previously changed date letters in the middle of the year so the OP watch dates to mid “58 to mid ‘59. My watch is a couple of years older.
Edited:
- Posts
- 2,278
- Likes
- 19,725
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 120
Artu58
·
- Posts
- 9,503
- Likes
- 14,985
padders
··Oooo subtitles!They might at least have spelled his name right if he was parting with £58.
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 120
- Posts
- 10
- Likes
- 0
Grandad Wales
·Still wearing this watch or ready to send it on to a good (now) home?
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 120
Artu58
·Still wearing this watch or ready to send it on to a good (now) home?
