Omega GMT

Posts
44
Likes
45
Is it fair to say omega is somewhat lacking in GMT options?

The World Timer is very bulky at 14mm and the PO is a bit of a niche product imo
 
Posts
1,852
Likes
2,811
I suppose, if you mean lacking in a specific GMT model line, like what Rolex has. But in terms of number of models (historic and current), I think they’re doing ok.
 
Posts
93
Likes
92
Has Omega ever made a GMT under 43mm? I feel like if they put out a GMT at 38-39mm and under 13mm in height it would do very well.

Overall I agree with the sentiment. Omega has an iconic chronograph that you can actually buy, the Aqua Terra compares well vs the OP and date just, Omega has plenty of great divers and some decent dress watches. But they have nothing like the Rolex GMT
 
Posts
1,852
Likes
2,811
I will say—for the little it’s worth—maybe I don’t travel enough, but I’ve never really understood the need for that complication. I mean, can’t you just, like, add or subtract in your head?

I think the main appeal of the GMTs in the Rolex lineup is the color options they introduce. The actually complication less so. (I got to see a polar Explorer in the metal not too long ago, after years of thinking I hated it—absolutely stunning watch. I’ll probably never buy another Rolex, but if I were to do so, that’d be the one. Not a true GMT, per se, but a similar complication.)
 
Posts
240
Likes
225
Luckily for you, there’s another Swatch Group option… Longines Spirit Zulu Time 39mm. Thank me later.
 
Posts
2,643
Likes
2,957
I will say—for the little it’s worth—maybe I don’t travel enough, but I’ve never really understood the need for that complication. I mean, can’t you just, like, add or subtract in your head?

I think the main appeal of the GMTs in the Rolex lineup is the color options they introduce. The actually complication less so. (I got to see a polar Explorer in the metal not too long ago, after years of thinking I hated it—absolutely stunning watch. I’ll probably never buy another Rolex, but if I were to do so, that’d be the one. Not a true GMT, per se, but a similar complication.)
It’s not just for travel. My job is located in Texas but our global HQ is in France. It would be great to have a wearable Omega GMT so I can have one hour hand set to Paris and the other hand set to CST so I won’t have to try to do the math.
 
Posts
160
Likes
258
It’s not just for travel. My job is located in Texas but our global HQ is in France. It would be great to have a wearable Omega GMT so I can have one hour hand set to Paris and the other hand set to CST so I won’t have to try to do the math.


Sounds like a good excuse for either a nice desk clock set to Paris time or a bit of double-wristing.
 
Posts
2,643
Likes
2,957
Sounds like a good excuse for either a nice desk clock set to Paris time or a bit of double-wristing.
JLC Atmos clock would be pretty cool.
 
Posts
44
Likes
45
Luckily for you, there’s another Swatch Group option… Longines Spirit Zulu Time 39mm. Thank me later.

I sort of 90% love this watch and 10% not sure. I need to go try it.

After all, it is a much better price than I am sure Omega would ever do.
 
Posts
56
Likes
124
Biggest hole in Omega's lineup right now is not having an Aqua Terra or 300M gmt.
 
Posts
93
Likes
92
I will say—for the little it’s worth—maybe I don’t travel enough, but I’ve never really understood the need for that complication. I mean, can’t you just, like, add or subtract in your head?

I think the main appeal of the GMTs in the Rolex lineup is the color options they introduce. The actually complication less so. (I got to see a polar Explorer in the metal not too long ago, after years of thinking I hated it—absolutely stunning watch. I’ll probably never buy another Rolex, but if I were to do so, that’d be the one. Not a true GMT, per se, but a similar complication.)

In the era of smartphones what complication is really needed though. For me, the chronograph is the least useful. I can’t imagine what event I would need to time to the second. I’m not a high school track coach.

IMO the true GMT with a jumping hour hand is just super cool and would occasionally be useful in my life.
 
Posts
1,852
Likes
2,811
In the era of smartphones what complication is really needed though. For me, the chronograph is the least useful. I can’t imagine what event I would need to time to the second. I’m not a high school track coach.

IMO the true GMT with a jumping hour hand is just super cool and would occasionally be useful in my life.

Point well taken.

I find a date (and especially a day-date) complication to be the most useful. Pretty much everything else is just there for the cool-factor. Having a timing bezel turns out to be truly helpful... a few times a year. 😀 I go back and forth: sometimes I think that all I want is a clean, uncluttered, time-only watch, like one of the 1948 Seamaster reissues. Other times I'm lusting for a Patek Complications with the full, three-window annual calendar, 24-hour indicator and moonphase. (Granted, Patek manages to make all of that appear in an uncluttered way.) I'm sure at some point I'll decide I can't live without a GMT.
 
Posts
1,852
Likes
2,811
I have the second one (the 50th anniversary) and it’s stood the test of time.

Yeah, I saw one of those (or a similar model, anyway--I didn't examine it too closely), preowned, at a dealer here in Maryland not too long ago: fantastic-looking watch in the metal. Way better than it photographs, IMO. It doesn't call attention the way multicolored Rolex GMTs do, and that's a good thing.
 
Posts
5,562
Likes
54,004
May as well throw in an illustration, these are always pretty easy to find.

 
Posts
44
Likes
45
Biggest hole in Omega's lineup right now is not having an Aqua Terra or 300M gmt.

technically the world timer is an aqua terra

but i think most would agree it's an acquired taste

one of those new 'shades' aqua terras with a GMT hand would be nice
 
Posts
93
Likes
92
Luckily for you, there’s another Swatch Group option… Longines Spirit Zulu Time 39mm. Thank me later.

So when Longines released this watch last year in the 42mm case there was a lot of online chatter about how it would be great if smaller. So this year they release it in 39mm and 13.5 thickness. If it was that quick and easy for Longines, why can’t Omega give us a 38mm Aqua Terra GMT with thickness around 13mm. I really think it would be a big hit, much more than some massive new world timers that nobody was asking for.

I do love the S&G Zulu time in 39mm. It’s beautiful IMO even for folks who traditionally don’t do S&G
 
Posts
240
Likes
225
So when Longines released this watch last year in the 42mm case there was a lot of online chatter about how it would be great if smaller. So this year they release it in 39mm and 13.5 thickness. If it was that quick and easy for Longines, why can’t Omega give us a 38mm Aqua Terra GMT with thickness around 13mm. I really think it would be a big hit, much more than some massive new world timers that nobody was asking for.

I do love the S&G Zulu time in 39mm. It’s beautiful IMO even for folks who traditionally don’t do S&G
They’re not doing it because they want you to buy the Longines. They won’t have two competing options in the same company line up.
 
Posts
93
Likes
92
They’re not doing it because they want you to buy the Longines. They won’t have two competing options in the same company line up.

Yah I don’t know about that. I feel like Longines and Omega are in different price points of the Swatch family. The Longines Zulu Time GMT retails around 3K. The Aqua Terra retails around 6K. And I’m thinking an AT GMT might retail closer to 7K. I just don’t see those two price points competing with each other.