Omega Constellation 168.005 Redial Check - Dogleg Pie Pan

Posts
7
Likes
4
I purchased this watch from reddit from a well.known seller on there. I just learned that there are redials etc. I wanted the knowledge of the forum to take a look and see if this is possibly one. Thanks all

 
Posts
10,607
Likes
16,566
The pics are very high contrast and overexposed. If there are any issues with the dial surface they will not be visible there but I see nothing to worry about with the dial originality at least. There could well be bubbles in the lacquer which aren't visible but I don't think it is a redial. The case seems OK but does look a bit soft. You could have done worse.
 
Posts
7
Likes
4
The pics are very high contrast and overexposed. If there are any issues with the dial surface they will not be visible there but I see nothing to worry about with the dial originality at least. There could well be bubbles in the lacquer which aren't visible but I don't think it is a redial. The case seems OK but does look a bit soft. You could have done worse.
That does feel a reassuring. What would you say about the marker at 3 o clock? Is it missing or did some 168.005 come without it? Also the movement is this

 
Posts
35,103
Likes
39,560
Some dials did have the marker at 3:00 and others didn't it depends on the dial. Not a bad example, polished but not excessively, dial and crown are correct, better than the majority of dogleg pie-pans for certain.

How much was it?
 
Posts
7
Likes
4
Some dials did have the marker at 3:00 and others didn't it depends on the dial. Not a bad example, polished but not excessively, dial and crown are correct, better than the majority of dogleg pie-pans for certain.

How much was it?
Good to know. I'm fairly new to vintage omegas so I'm still learning.

Inpaid 2450 shipped USD
 
Posts
93
Likes
135
As @padders has already said, the biggest issue with the pics is that they have been manipulated to make the dial look better than it possibly is. But it doesn't show any obvious signs of being a re-dial. In fact it looks like a pretty nice watch overall. Should wear great on the wrist!
 
Posts
7
Likes
4
As @padders has already said, the biggest issue with the pics is that they have been manipulated to make the dial look better than it possibly is. But it doesn't show any obvious signs of being a re-dial. In fact it looks like a pretty nice watch overall. Should wear great on the wrist!
Seller says 100% original but I don't know what to look for but I'll take some pics when I get it
 
Posts
3,490
Likes
13,346
Looks like crazing on the plexi, little tension cracks. Quite normal, that comes with age, just something to have in mind. I’d have the plexi replaced soon-ish.


By the way, when people here say the case is a little soft, this is a rather sharp lug for comparison:


It’s still attractive though, the dogleg shape is present.
 
Posts
118
Likes
63
Yep, there are huge amount of redials these days. Some quite well made. But yours looks all original and overall in a good shape, congrats.
 
Posts
7
Likes
4
Yep, there are huge amount of redials these days. Some quite well made. But yours looks all original and overall in a good shape, congrats.
Thanks for the reassurance
 
Posts
7
Likes
4
Looks like crazing on the plexi, little tension cracks. Quite normal, that comes with age, just something to have in mind. I’d have the plexi replaced soon-ish.


By the way, when people here say the case is a little soft, this is a rather sharp lug for comparison:


It’s still attractive though, the dogleg shape is present.
Appreciate your insight. I wasn't sure what that scuff or mark was but here are closer pics of it

 
Posts
3,773
Likes
6,416
Nothing is wrong with your watch, it was a late production of 168.005 and it doesn't have the small marker at 3, the tops of hour markers were painted black, not black onyx inserts like the earlier production.
This is an earlier production for you to compare.