Forums Latest Members
  1. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    15,492
    Likes
    32,385
    I have an Omega Automatic (OT 2767) from 1955 with a cal 354.

    I got the watch with the original box and warranty booklet.

    The box liner and lid refers to the watch as Omega Seamaster Automatic Chronometer.

    My extract from the archives doesn't mention anything about chronometer rating.

    Did these movements have a group of chronometer graded items?

    Some pics are here.

    WRUW today?
     
  2. John R Smith Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    If your 354 is chronometer rated, it will have the "Adjusted five (5) positions and temperatures" legend engraved on the rotor. The Omega database lists your case (2767) as chronometer certified, so that supports your provenance.

    John
     
  3. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    15,492
    Likes
    32,385
    Thanks John,

    That concurs with my observations, however the "Adjusted five (5) positions and temperatures" doesn't appear on my movement.

    I'm not too concerned about it, just the WIS coming out in me. I think I'll just get a nice strap for it and enjoy it :)

    P1010237 copy.jpg
     
  4. John R Smith Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    The movement is probably 1953, working from the serial number which is a late 13xxxxxx item. But not COSC certified, unless someone swapped the rotor.

    John
     
  5. ulackfocus Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    The dial would say CHRONOMETER if it came from Bienne rated as such. Many Seamasters had non-chronometer 354's in them. Lots of possibilities here - John points out one:

    Others are the movement and dial were swapped out completely, or what IMO is more likely is that the box isn't original to the watch - either the seller added it later <or> the dealer gave the original buyer the wrong box (two equally likely scenarios).
     
  6. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,836
    Case ref. 2767 is a non-chronometre seamaster case reference and your example is a typical one. I share Dennis' theory that the box has been incorrectly paired with the watch.
     
  7. John R Smith Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    Actually, I stumbled here, but you were all too kind to point it out - COSC didn't exist until 1970-something, so it would be whatever it was before that - BOs or whatever. It could be the wrong box, of course. The watch and the box could have been paired up quite recently, in fact. We can all buy boxes on eBay, these days.

    John
     
  8. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,836
    Omega has had chronometre certified movements from the late 1930s - so it's not a dating issue. It's just that 2767 is typically a non-chronometre case reference.
     
  9. ulackfocus Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    Mike, I think what he means is that the organization Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres has only existed as COSC since 1973. Previously, there were other chronometer certification organizations - but they were all combined to make COSC.
     
  10. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    12,207
    Likes
    15,726
    Here is a letter from the predecessor of the COSC (from Mondodec's Constellation Collector's website)

    [​IMG]

    Take care,
    gatorcpa
     
  11. ulackfocus Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    Man they had a lot of typos and misspellings back then! :p I can't understand a damn word.
     
  12. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 8, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    ::confused2::
    Monsieur, vous n'êtes pas de Bienne?
     
  13. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    15,492
    Likes
    32,385
    Thanks for all of the comments and advice Gentlemen.

    In summary, based on your feedback and my observations:

    I'm 100% confident that the watch is completely original and the box doesn't belong with the watch (although it originally came with the watch).

    The original owners have no idea on how to swap rotors or change dials or cases, they are definitely "WIS Muggles".
    The inside of the case bears no repair inscriptions, which were commonplace until recent times so I'd discount a service replacement rotor.

    Taking it all into account, I'm of the opinion that the watch was sold with the box, possibly because it was the closest to hand, and in 1955 I don't think they worried about boxes as much as we do today, it was simply packaging to get it home.

    All irrelevant really, but it does make this an interesting hobby when you start doing detective work.

    Cheers

    Jim

    [​IMG]
     
    Central Scrutinizer likes this.
  14. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,791
    Jim is that new?? While I certainly understand the meaning (think it is great), I have not seen it used. :thumbsup: Did you coin the combination?
     
  15. Privateday7 quotes Miss Universe Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    5,753
    Likes
    2,903
    I like it........WIS muggles. So we are WISzards?:D
     
  16. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    3,420
    Likes
    7,746
    Us Yankee WISholes don't know what a "muggle" is. In St. Looey a muggle would be snuggling after a mugging!
     
    Central Scrutinizer and JimInOz like this.
  17. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    15,492
    Likes
    32,385

    I saw it used in another connotation, can't remember perzakly where, not the watch world though, but the fanboys referred to those who weren't in the inner circle as muggles, obviously from HP.

    It just struck me as fitting in this case, they hardly knew what a watch was, hence the appropriation of Ms Rowlings term.
     
  18. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    15,492
    Likes
    32,385

    ::rimshot::
     
  19. Central Scrutinizer hangs out in Joe's garage Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    440
    Likes
    265
    Muggles and WISards :p I can see that catching on around here
     
  20. ulackfocus Jun 11, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    We have WISdom.