Omega Apollo 11 50th Anniversary Moonwatch Gold and Steel. Any in the wild yet?

Posts
531
Likes
1,183
I had this exact discussion with a PP AD who said if that were the case they would take the watch back and give full refund.
I didn’t know that. Omega never told me they have this policy because they don’t , most watches of all brands except for certain models cost less the moment you walk out
 
Posts
447
Likes
510
HMRC would have to prove that you were a trader, there is nothing to stop you as an individual buying grannies car cheap, tidying it up and selling it on for a profit to help you buy your next car, lots of people do it and I don't see HMRC knocking on peoples doors demanding tax.
I’ve very close experience that tells me that HMRC don’t need to PROVE anything when searching through your tax records. If they see a pattern they will jump on you.

HMRC won’t be knocking on doors in the above example as they would never know. But I’m 100% certain that your above example should be declared.
 
Posts
331
Likes
195
HMRC would have to prove that you were a trader, there is nothing to stop you as an individual buying grannies car cheap, tidying it up and selling it on for a profit to help you buy your next car, lots of people do it and I don't see HMRC knocking on peoples doors demanding tax.
It is the pattern of behaviour. It is still trading. The Y
Here's the link to the HMRC guidance in the UK - https://www.gov.uk/capital-gains-tax-personal-possessions - it is guidance so there is, as always, interpretation as others' have said and the real issue would be around the differential between being seen a business vs the trade being of a personal asset. Watches are deemed to be assets with a 'limited lifespan' which helps, but if it's an asset above £6k then that raises a flag the other way.

P.s. I'm not a tax expert 😁
capital gains and trading are different
 
Posts
463
Likes
767
So all those people who bought a SS Rolex in the UK this year, sold it immediately for a profit, will be chased for tax by HMRC as they traded their watch to make a profit? I somehow don't think that this is going to happen.
I don’t think anyone would be chased here in the USA neither but if they found out then you could pay more in fines plus the taxes. I know that depending on how big and how often you get transfers on your bank account, the bank has to send some kind of report to the IRS.
 
Posts
463
Likes
767
I’ve very close experience that tells me that HMRC don’t need to PROVE anything when searching through your tax records. If they see a pattern they will jump on you.

HMRC won’t be knocking on doors in the above example as they would never know. But I’m 100% certain that your above example should be declared.
I agree. It would be considered income.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,705
They won’t be chased by HMRC as HMRC wouldn’t have a clue about it. But I bet if they phoned HMRC up and asked them, HMRC would want them to declare it.

'Want' - Yes HMRC would 'want' a person to declare the profit but the reality is that this never happens and HMRC have bigger fish to catch than a guy flipping a watch or a car or a........ so never chase.
 
Posts
531
Likes
1,183
But how would hMRC knows that you are trading , how do they monitor this activity?
 
Posts
27
Likes
27
It is the pattern of behaviour. It is still trading. The Y

capital gains and trading are different

Stuart, totally agree. There is a decision tree in effect built into the guidance in that it specifically starts with business vs personal and the guidance relates to the personal branch. If it looked like you were trading as a business (even as a sole trader) then the tax treatment would be different. It's all a grey area and why tax advisers can charge enough to by gold Omegas 🙄
 
Posts
331
Likes
195
But how would hMRC knows that you are trading , how do they monitor this activity?
HMRC have teams that monitor various websites eBay being one.
 
Posts
27
Likes
27
But how would hMRC knows that you are trading , how do they monitor this activity?

They probably just watch forums like this 🤦
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,705
I had this exact discussion with a PP AD who said if that were the case they would take the watch back and give full refund.

Yes I am sure that they would, but as I have paid for the watch it is my decision how I dispose of it, I might take the honourable route and see if the AD would take it back, they may they may not, I might decide to sell it on e-bay, I might decide to sell it on a forum, I might decide to sell it to a family member who offered me the RRP for it, I might sell it to the guy down the road who offered me 'a margin' on the watch, it is my decision what I do with the watch after all I paid for it.
 
Posts
331
Likes
195
Yes I am sure that they would, but as I have paid for the watch it is my decision how I dispose of it, I might take the honourable route and see if the AD would take it back, they may they may not, I might decide to sell it on e-bay, I might decide to sell it on a forum, I might decide to sell it to a family member who offered me the RRP for it, I might sell it to the guy down the road who offered me 'a margin' on the watch, it is my decision what I do with the watch after all I paid for it.
Again pattern of behaviour. Once fair enough, ten times?
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,705
HMRC have teams that monitor various websites eBay being one.

Yes and they look for patterns, look for regulars, not a person selling something that they have decided they no longer want for whatever reason.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,705
Again pattern of behaviour. Once fair enough, ten times?

We have established that it is a pattern of behaviour, not a one off, so HMRC would have to prove that you are a trader by demonstrating that you have made a number of trades that resulted in you having an income from the trades, yes?

So, if I buy a 50th Snoopy, and flip it, for a profit HMRC are not going to chase me for some tax.
 
Posts
35
Likes
60
Come on guys, you’re ruining this thread. Why don’t you exchange emails and fight it out that way.

If you’re not loving this watch and planning to keep it, why are you even here?
 
Posts
331
Likes
195
We have established that it is a pattern of behaviour, not a one off, so HMRC would have to prove that you are a trader by demonstrating that you have made a number of trades that resulted in you having an income from the trades, yes?

So, if I buy a 50th Snoopy, and flip it, for a profit HMRC are not going to chase me for some tax.
Effectively yes, you would have significant undeclared income. One offs are more difficult to prove.
 
Posts
5,062
Likes
22,845
Just got a good scare while polishing what I thought to be scratches on the moonshine bezel at 12 o'clock under the rim and it isn't even 1 day old. Turns out at closer inspection with the loupe it just inscribed markings with the omega logo and material code.
 
Posts
27
Likes
27
Just got a good scare while polishing what I thought to be scratches on the moonshine bezel at 12 o'clock under the rim and it isn't even 1 day old. Turns out at closer inspection with the loupe it just inscribed markings with the omega logo and material code.

Good spot, don't over polish it now though 😉
 
Posts
1,530
Likes
3,589
HMRC would look at intent and pattern of behaviour. It would be difficult to justify buying a PP nautilus on a Friday for £22k and then selling on Saturday £35k, without them think you bought to sell. most AD’s would be unhappy with that. However, if you bought a Rolex in 1999 then you sell it in 2019, for significantly more. The HMRC would look at the pattern of behaviour. It is a fine line between trading and moving a collection around.

Well my pattern is I bought one watch and sold it and few days later, that's it.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,705
Well my pattern is I bought one watch and sold it and few days later, that's it.

Just keep an eye out for those strange men in dark glasses close to the homestead, they'll be 'watching' you 😁