Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I've got one too, 53.7 movement, very low serial 18'XXX... Yours is much younger, after 1962.
Don't know much about it either. Very Nice piece anyway.
@Flavio
I believe you have a delightful example. Congrats. You are very lucky to own such nice precision timepiece.
Please excuse me as I maybe mistaken, according to what i can read from one photo only:
24'''
Cal 1130
a Split-second Chronograph measuring to an 1/10s
ref 713
@uwsearch
You have a ridiculous set of stop and pocket watches, but in this case of top trumps you are second, Sadly I loose as I have nothing close to these mega pieces - you have to give the card to Flavio or me 😀
Please excuse me as Im often mistaken, according to what i can see this is my humble comparison.
Missing pusher at 11
Missing 2nd "outer track"
Only one central second hand for chrono function
thus ==>
24'''
Cal 1000
a Chronograph measuring to an 1/5s possibly
ref 701
Both were available in 65 but until i can get home and actually dig out the fournitures to get introduction dates this is the best i can do.
Please i am a noob and a fan 1st so please if there is fitting description I am happy to learn. Please get a quality watchmaker to better make accurate description.
What would the Omega equivalent models/ref be?
Keep up the good work Uwsearch
All the best
p

and I don't even remember how I got it.Hi! I have an Omega MG 6413 Chronograph from a few years. It's working perfectly, although it's not so perfect in aesthetics.
Also have a red stand.
Honestly, I'm not a collector of this kind of clocks and I don't even remember how I got it.
It has a counter from 010 to 100... and I don't know which sports or area it was used in.
Any opinion about this piece and its value?
Thanks all